Earlier quoted context omitted.
> far more valuable than HN + Reddit + Facebook combined What do you learn from 280 characters at a time?
The 280 character limit was raised to 4,000 in February of 2023.
"If nothing changes, all remaining Nitter instances will go down eventually"
111–120 of 384 posts
Re: "If nothing changes, all remaining Nitter instances will go down eventually"
#112X/Twitter is a gross network. It’s like posting links to 4chan.
Re: "If nothing changes, all remaining Nitter instances will go down eventually"
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
> far more valuable than HN + Reddit + Facebook combined What do you learn from 280 characters at a time?
[flagged]
Re: "If nothing changes, all remaining Nitter instances will go down eventually"
#114Short of signing up for an account, is there currently a reasonable way of reading those?
Re: "If nothing changes, all remaining Nitter instances will go down eventually"
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting because the content I get on X is far, far more valuable than HN + Reddit + Facebook combined. It’s the only place you can follow subject matter experts and get their real time thoughts. I think people on HN just don’t know how to use Twitter? If you want to use it effectively, you have to utilize lists. Curate your own lists or find someone you respect and follow their lists. If someone is posting things…
Why is this reply getting downvoted?
Re: "If nothing changes, all remaining Nitter instances will go down eventually"
#116This is disappointing because often times people link to threads on Twitter but if you’re lucky enough to not get a login wall, the full thread wont be visible without logging in. (Which I’m not going to do) I really wish people would just stop linking me to twitter (or better yet, stop using it altogether).
Why not make an account if you want to read it?
Re: "If nothing changes, all remaining Nitter instances will go down eventually"
#117Would a self-hosted private instance of Nitter be an option to avoid rate limits, or are Twitter accounts being penalized for using any third-party API client?
You could, but you'd have to make your own personal twitter account. At that point you're using Twitter with extra steps.
Re: "If nothing changes, all remaining Nitter instances will go down eventually"
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is this reply getting downvoted?
I'm guessing 1) HN readers don't like Elon Musk (I don't like him either) so they don't like Twitter 2) I implied HN readers are doing something wrong (as any other human being, they don't like being told that) 3) I (slightly) insulted the intelligence of HN readers by saying they didn't know how to use Twitter and they really don't like that I've just gotten downvotes and no one's responded with any actual rebuttals…
Re: "If nothing changes, all remaining Nitter instances will go down eventually"
#119Would a self-hosted private instance of Nitter be an option to avoid rate limits, or are Twitter accounts being penalized for using any third-party API client?
You could, but you'd have to make your own personal twitter account. At that point you're using Twitter with extra steps.
The benefit of extra steps is a client under user control, e.g. filtering, RSS, better threading and more.
Re: "If nothing changes, all remaining Nitter instances will go down eventually"
#120On one hand, this is unfortunate since X always directs me to a login page, and Nitter was the only way I could view whatever gets posted nowadays. On the other hand, the cynical side of me is thankful that I have no more desirable means to see the contents of posts on X. Edit: a similar thing happened with Reddit and Teddit(?). API restrictions effectively killed alternative frontends, so I simply don't look at Redd…
While it is unmaintained now due to the API changes, Libreddit (reddit frontend) is still working for me. Granted, I self-host it, and I'm the only user so I never hit the rate limit, but no issues at all, save for some of the changes reddit has made (namely the new share links)