Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not use the root.hints file available for this purpose? https://www.iana.org/domains/root/files Generally it is already included with most DNS servers, such as BIND.
That is useful for the initial bootstrapping but should be updated or at least validated a few times a year. If package maintainers are updating it a few times a year that works too.
Issues with 1.1.1.1 public resolver and WARP
111–118 of 118 posts
Re: Issues with 1.1.1.1 public resolver and WARP
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
> thus has a hardcoded exception to intentionally return bogus results to Cloudflare's resolvers. This is a bad practice.
why in the world are they doing that I wonder.
Re: Issues with 1.1.1.1 public resolver and WARP
#113Re: Issues with 1.1.1.1 public resolver and WARP
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah but that's the same as a regular home DNS server that isn't recursive. Your devices also have their own cache.
The point is that if the TTL is 10mins and you lookup the domain after it expires the regular DNS will go and fetch it, unbound fetches it as soon as it expires and it is already cached
Re: Issues with 1.1.1.1 public resolver and WARP
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
Switched off 1.1.1.1 for that reason a while back. Currently using OpenDNS which is now unfortunately owned by Cisco. Definitely a lack of actually open alternatives.
A Pihole will do what you want with a ton of control added.
Re: Issues with 1.1.1.1 public resolver and WARP
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Switched off 1.1.1.1 for that reason a while back. Currently using OpenDNS which is now unfortunately owned by Cisco. Definitely a lack of actually open alternatives.
Running your own resolver that points directly to root servers is also an option. https://nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound/about/ It isn't too complicated to set up and provides faster responses than external DNS servers, especially after the cache gets built up a bit.
Re: Issues with 1.1.1.1 public resolver and WARP
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
Correct. Cloudflare's POP routing is quite extensive, and I'd be shocked if archive.is had more than a handful of backends it's routing to. Even so, why would an extra few dozen ms matter at all? Archive.is appears to be spindle-limited, is a client with marginally higher RTT an issue? The admin is silly. https://www.cloudflare.com/network/
Do you happen to have a mapping of Cloudflare IP space to physical POPs? To the best of my knowledge they do not publish this, which makes it quite a chore to track all their edge locations manually.
Re: Issues with 1.1.1.1 public resolver and WARP
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
Switched off 1.1.1.1 for that reason a while back. Currently using OpenDNS which is now unfortunately owned by Cisco. Definitely a lack of actually open alternatives.
It works again, so you can go back to 1.1.1.1