Live data from Hacker News

Google Ending Support for Jamboard

workspaceupdates.googleblog.com

111–120 of 289 posts

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#111
I have one of these in our office that's been passed from company to company. We don't pay for it and just use it as a (very nice-looking) rolling TV (it has an HDMI input on the back, thankfully).

Any Android exports out there have a sense for how hard it'd be to get root access to something like this?

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#112
I knows schools and businesses that bought these. Should have just bought normal 4k touchscreen displays with rolling stands. Then you can use whatever software you want on it. Could even run google's browser-based jamboard on the non-jamboard display.

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#114
post #109

I can predict the whining already, but 8 years is really not a short lifespan for a product. That's an honest effort at getting a market, which failed. That's life.

Nothing wrong with pulling the plug, but there’s a common expectation that unless you go out of business you’ll keep supporting a product for years after you stop selling it. Imagine if Honda decided to stop selling the Accord and on the same day their dealerships stopped carrying parts for it. Would you be willing to buy any model from them knowing it can be abandoned at any moment?

There is, my device is perfectly functional. You shouldn't need to replace $device because they want to make another quick cash grab. Companies should be forced to support the device until the end of universe.

It'd cut down the constant increasing rate of e-waste, rehashes of the same product that contain nothing innovative other than a new camera.

And if $app isn't supported on the older hardware, that's then up to the user to upgrade rather than an path where your forced to upgrade.

Better yet allow the user to swap-out the old device for the new version. I paid €900 outright for my iPhone XR. If Apple want me to use their new device then allow me to trade-in.

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#115
I don't know what the success rate is so far, but it has to be low single digits of Google products/services that stick around? Has anyone ever done that math?

EDIT:

Based on this list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_products

I didn't do any editing of the list, just ran wc -l on the 2 lists, so all of those phones are still considered production. That's probably not correct, but I'm not energetic enough to fix it.

Looks like it's right around 50/50, so about 1/2 their products are discontinued/failed.

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#116

I can predict the whining already, but 8 years is really not a short lifespan for a product. That's an honest effort at getting a market, which failed. That's life.

It’s still yet another instance of an unsolved problem in this industry: what happens when a company gives up the will to provide supporting infrastructure to devices that they release? Traditionally, the consumer had a chance of continuing to run the device, since it was independent of cloud services. Now these devices are necessarily dependent on these companies with no duty of responsibility on their part. The companies demand subscription income to use the device and then kick users to the curb when the costs exceed that income. This is when consumer protection measures should step in to keep company’s “shareholder value optimization” tendencies in check. For example: keep all device schematics and protocols in escrow such that a community could continue to support the device.

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#117

How people continue to trust buying anything from Google is just beyond me. I am glad that they are doing something for schools, but this is just ridiculous. Shutting down a free service that you didn't have to buy into, fine whatever. It still sucks but at least you didn't invest in a platform. But if you are going to make a physical device you cannot treat it like you treat everything else.

I understand outrage, but I think it’s misdirected in this occasion. It’s an 8 year old product, that because of the price, age and small niche like had customers that you can count in hundreds.

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#118

How people continue to trust buying anything from Google is just beyond me. I am glad that they are doing something for schools, but this is just ridiculous. Shutting down a free service that you didn't have to buy into, fine whatever. It still sucks but at least you didn't invest in a platform. But if you are going to make a physical device you cannot treat it like you treat everything else.

what product or service has lasted indefinitely? Google will compensate those who adopted it, life goes on.

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#119
post #110

This device, like Stadia, was actually pretty great/amazing. Just incredible to see Google fuck these things up from a marketing/sales/strategy perspective. Amazing technology turned to (expensive) dust.

stadia with take-hands-off-controller before visually updating was amazing? it was one of the quickest plug pulls for a reason

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The device cost $6k and $600/yr from the article. Not free but I doubt many people are affected.

It doesn't really matter how many people were affected, the point is that people made an investment (and not a small one) and its being shut down. And it isn't like this is the first hardware that Google has abandoned, but they turn it into ewaste since it's tied to the cloud.

It’s being shutdown after 8 years. That’s not a bad lifespan. Most electronics are obsolete but that age and replaced with new ones. Especially at businesses - it’s already amortized by then and reached end of life.

Google sucks, but I think you’re blowing this out of proportion.

Post reply on HN