Live data from Hacker News

A new instrument found unusual success

theguardian.com

111–112 of 112 posts

Re: A new instrument found unusual success

#111
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> patent trolling They’re just not licensing the patent to other manufacturers. Patent trolling is an entirely different thing.

> They’re just not licensing the patent to other manufacturers Who? Some data backing the claim up please.

No. It’s impossible to provide data for a negative like this. I searched for data on how they’re protecting their patent and found nothing.

You’re just sealioning (which is ironically a form of online trolling). You provide the data. You’re the one making the claim that they’re trolling.

Re: A new instrument found unusual success

#112
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They’re just not licensing the patent to other manufacturers Who? Some data backing the claim up please.

No. It’s impossible to provide data for a negative like this. I searched for data on how they’re protecting their patent and found nothing. You’re just sealioning (which is ironically a form of online trolling). You provide the data. You’re the one making the claim that they’re trolling.

I'm confused. You made a statement that they're not licensing their patent. I'm asking you what is that based on. Who asked to license their patent and was denied? Surely you have that since you made that claim right? Just your imagination or actual verifiable evidence that the rest of us can check? If challenging your claim is trolling or sealioning or cat fishing or bear baiting or worm wiggling, then so be it.
Post reply on HN