Live data from Hacker News

Goodreads has no incentive to be good

countercraft.substack.com

111–120 of 245 posts

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#111
post #10

Goodreads is only good (eh, decent?) as a database of books you've read. All the other functionality is pointless and or broken. The recommendation system is a joke and is obviously used to promote nonsense instead of giving you personalised recommendations.

I found it often did what social media is partly designed to do—-make one insecure about whatever the focus is. You’re either not reading the right books, not analyzing and commenting enough on books you read for enjoyment, or not reading enough regardless of your actual place on those subjective spectrums. All their to make you feed the social media machine with your free labor in the form of analysis/reviews or whatever.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#113

I anything actually good anymore? - Goodreads: Broken recommendation system, meh UI, review wars - Google Search: Pointless - Reddit: Overtly user-hostile, poor UX, tiktokified - YouTube: Mainstream, ad-riddled, tiktokified - Yelp: Cluttered-UI, favors jerks, hostile to businesses - Gmail: Oh yeah we're gonna delete your emails if you don't log in after a while - Netflix: Shrinking catalogue, worse quality shows - In…

I feel like more it’s more interesting to discuss why everything got bad. These companies all grew up and reality hit

- Goodreads: Never was going to be massive social network. Hard to monetize so little investment.

- Google Search: SEO + ads obscures what people are looking for

- Reddit: Too much investment for the companies current size and lack of growth. Poor new products offerings

- YouTube: Taken over by engagement bate and need to monetize

- Yelp: business model provides bad incentives

- Gmail: promised everyone free stuff and doesn’t charge. Needs to cover costs

- Netflix: doesn’t actually own most of the content users used to watch. Has no more subscriber growth

- Instagram: Losing ground to new social network and must adapt to be more video+algorithmic

- Twitter: makes no money. Had too many employees. Run by Elon who is controversial. Moderation is expensive

- Facebook: for my generation at least, a combination of things led people to migrate to other places

- Wikipedia: people who moderate for free have agendas

- LinkedIn: business model makes for bad incentives

- DuckDuckGo: hard to be the third place social network

- Amazon: moderation is hard, too much seo and ads, direct from china allows for more cheap goods but introduces more fakes

- Medium: nobody wants to pay for pretend news

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#114
post #95

I anything actually good anymore? - Goodreads: Broken recommendation system, meh UI, review wars - Google Search: Pointless - Reddit: Overtly user-hostile, poor UX, tiktokified - YouTube: Mainstream, ad-riddled, tiktokified - Yelp: Cluttered-UI, favors jerks, hostile to businesses - Gmail: Oh yeah we're gonna delete your emails if you don't log in after a while - Netflix: Shrinking catalogue, worse quality shows - In…

ChatGPT: ???

ChatGPT: Ruined TV by causing a writers strike...

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#115
post #98
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google maps is basically the only app as I see it which is still amazing. Besides the whole tracking your entire location thing, but you can mitigate that.

i hate how they worked ads into directions. i know some people find it easy to hear "turn left at the mcdonald's" but i've been fine at estimating distance and don't need to hear the name of a chain.

I now use Apple Maps for navigation because of this “feature”.

Google Maps is still much better for searching, but the gap seems to be closing.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#116
post #81

I anything actually good anymore? - Goodreads: Broken recommendation system, meh UI, review wars - Google Search: Pointless - Reddit: Overtly user-hostile, poor UX, tiktokified - YouTube: Mainstream, ad-riddled, tiktokified - Yelp: Cluttered-UI, favors jerks, hostile to businesses - Gmail: Oh yeah we're gonna delete your emails if you don't log in after a while - Netflix: Shrinking catalogue, worse quality shows - In…

Absolutely. May I add one more? - Hacker News: filled with old ~men~ people shouting at clouds, reminiscing about how things were better in the good old days.

I live in the suburbs so no one comes by lawn, ergo this is where I shout at the kids to get off my website

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#117

I anything actually good anymore? - Goodreads: Broken recommendation system, meh UI, review wars - Google Search: Pointless - Reddit: Overtly user-hostile, poor UX, tiktokified - YouTube: Mainstream, ad-riddled, tiktokified - Yelp: Cluttered-UI, favors jerks, hostile to businesses - Gmail: Oh yeah we're gonna delete your emails if you don't log in after a while - Netflix: Shrinking catalogue, worse quality shows - In…

Creating something good requires a lot of effort and it's not just 1 thing you have to be good at but 1000 things.

Any business has thousands of moving parts which all need to work properly or the website or operation shall fail.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#118

I anything actually good anymore? - Goodreads: Broken recommendation system, meh UI, review wars - Google Search: Pointless - Reddit: Overtly user-hostile, poor UX, tiktokified - YouTube: Mainstream, ad-riddled, tiktokified - Yelp: Cluttered-UI, favors jerks, hostile to businesses - Gmail: Oh yeah we're gonna delete your emails if you don't log in after a while - Netflix: Shrinking catalogue, worse quality shows - In…

The enshittification continues.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#120
post #10

Goodreads is only good (eh, decent?) as a database of books you've read. All the other functionality is pointless and or broken. The recommendation system is a joke and is obviously used to promote nonsense instead of giving you personalised recommendations.

I'm not sure why people like it so much. My aunt-in-law is high pressuring me to use it. I have my library listing all the books I checked out. I have a pdf/epub reader that has a history of the books I read(although a new phone will probably wipe that out). For a while, I was merely writing down my books in a dedicated notebook, but I realized that it didn't really matter, if a book was important, I remembered it. I…

But you don't just track books you've read, you also track books you want to read, which is much harder to remember.

I also tag them to indicate if I already own them and in what format (physical, epub, audio).

Saves me from purchasing duplicates when I'm at the used book store.

Post reply on HN