Live data from Hacker News

Facebook settles with FTC, under privacy watch for 20 years

ftc.gov

111–120 of 135 posts

Re: Facebook settles with FTC, under privacy watch for 20 years

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The trouble is, it only "forces" Facebook to do anything if there will be meaningful sanctions if they don't. They've just been found, in a formal investigation, to have broken numerous fundamental privacy laws across several continents, and been punished with... absolutely nothing, as far as I can tell. All this has done is teach them that they are above the law and should feel free to continue doing whatever they l…

With this decision they are subject to 20 years of audits. It's not like they got off with just a warning.

Audits will prevent future action, but there's apparently no punishment for past actions. So, they got away with it.

Re: Facebook settles with FTC, under privacy watch for 20 years

#112
post #2

Wow, this list is brutal: -In December 2009, Facebook changed its website so certain information that users may have designated as private – such as their Friends List – was made public. They didn't warn users that this change was coming, or get their approval in advance. - Facebook represented that third-party apps that users' installed would have access only to user information that they needed to operate. In fact,…

Whatever trouble Facebook has with the FTC, it will face roughly 300 million times that trouble in Europe, where the rules are much more strict, and the data protection authorities have much greater power to act on behalf of the general public and individual interests.

That whole using-personal-information-to-burn-people thing is still (barely) in living memory in Europe. There have been riots in Germany over the government trying to take a census - with good reason.

Privacy is more important than a lot of shallow people imagine.

Re: Facebook settles with FTC, under privacy watch for 20 years

#113
Okay so question on this one.

- required to prevent anyone from accessing a user's material more than 30 days after the user has deleted his or her account;

Does this include people that have already deleted their account? Does this also include Government agencies and such from seeing the >30 day deleted data? I'd like to know that after permanently deleting my account all my stuff is gone, but I don't really see anywhere that says that's true. Meaning the site is still destroying my privacy even after I've decided to have nothing to do with the account.

Re: Facebook settles with FTC, under privacy watch for 20 years

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So... quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Perhaps the problem isn't that there's no one to watch the watchmen, but that we're over-reliant on watchmen. You don't need the FTC to keep Facebook from sharing your private information. I'm not saying Facebook did nothing wrong, and I'm not saying the FTC is doing nothing wrong now. I'm saying that none of it matters if you delete your own account. You don't need to worry about…

Look, here's the FTC's mandate: "Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful." The FTC exists to enforce that. Now, it's fashionable nowadays for the ill-informed to insist that government is worthless, but in fact this law and similar ones underly every aspect of American society and you owe everything to hav…

My argument is that Facebook has a history of mishandling privacy.

And further that users have been, at least on some level, aware of it.

I was on Facebook when they first implemented the news feed and got everyone upset. They've since introduced dozens of features that have gotten everyone upset (or at least a sizable enough minority to be noticeable). They make it clear that ads are targeted based on your personal information. They make privacy settings complicated. They continuously push you to supply more information, connect with more people, use Facebook for more things. They continuously make more things public by default, and add more features that make personal information discoverable (such as tagging in images).

If they weren't suspicious, they wouldn't have been investigated in the first place.

I'm not talking about a time machine. But let me observe a few things:

- I deleted my account a year ago (and knew I wanted to before that) without the FTC investigating anything. Because Facebook was clearly suspicious.

- You still have an account today even though you know about Facebook's lies today. You don't need a time machine to make changes today.

My argument is this:

Fraud protection is extremely important. There are many cases where there is no suspicion of fraud, no source of information about possible fraud, and consumers get taken advantage of. For example, people get taken advantage of by phishing every day.

But if you fall victim to increasingly bad phishing attacks from the same company over the course of years, you aren't paying attention. You are relying on watchmen to protect you and not watching out for yourself.

I am not blaming the victim. I am trying to empower the victim. Everyone who is reading this and still has a Facebook account knows that Facebook will outright lie about privacy in order to make more money from advertisers. They are still guilty of their actions if you get fooled again, but you don't have to get fooled again.

My argument is "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me."

Re: Facebook settles with FTC, under privacy watch for 20 years

#116

So the penalty for ongoing repeated lies and fraud is.... nothing. Zero. The FTC has investigated, and the settlement is zero money and zero penalties. Not one dollar. Whew! I'm glad they were punished! They won't do THAT again! The U.S. is really in late-stage empire breakdown. I don't think there is any significant enforcement of any laws whatsoever against companies and people that are reasonably well connected. T…

Throughout the entire history of the US, you can dig up these kind of antics, what makes this different from those antics that signals that this points to 'late-stage empire breakdown'?

Re: Facebook settles with FTC, under privacy watch for 20 years

#117
It is our mistake we made them now they sell us as product http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3293936

When I created an account with HN using Google account via ClickPass, one of the screen steps before I grant access to ClickPass, Google advised me to not grant it and if I do it I can cancel it any time which it will prevent ClickPass to access to my account information and my password.

This warning statement is not new; it’s there everywhere when you grant any application to use your Facebook, Twitter, Google ... etc accounts.

In the mean time Google Search is nothing without us, because "we are the product", they sell (us to third parties or Governments) or use our "private information" or what they told us it’s private without approval from us.

Facebook is doing same thing and that’s why their entire business model under fire in the EU. http://venturebeat.com/2011/11/28/facebook-advertising-eu/ Do you remember what happened in 2008 with Google’s Evil EULA (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/03/google_chrome_eula_s...)?

Now, are we "the product" still having any privacy? Are we safe? How far we can trust those businesses?

Should we keep using their services; and later complain about how evil their Terms and conditions or EULA are???

Re: Facebook settles with FTC, under privacy watch for 20 years

#118
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"- Facebook represented that third-party apps that users' installed would have access only to user information that they needed to operate. In fact, the apps could access nearly all of users' personal data – data the apps didn't need." Privacy/ethics issues aside, from a pure developer standpoint, isn't this just a feature? Where do we draw the line between functionality and privacy? User A allows user B to see her d…

It ceases to be honest when you incorrectly tell users that the apps "would have access only to user information that they needed to operate".

Nevermind how they would go about determining and implementing that boundary logic.

Re: Facebook settles with FTC, under privacy watch for 20 years

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They knowingly lied to their customers, if these allegations are true.

Facebook users are not Facebook's customers.

Is anyone else really tired of reading this "you're not the customer, you're the product" platitude every day, especially in contexts like here where it's totally irrelevant? Yes, we get it, Facebook isn't directly making money off their users.
Post reply on HN