Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is the 100x valid? The odds of a founder dying vs. the chances of a company shutting down seem not apples-to-apples I would guess there are many cases of solo founders shutting down their business other than founder death...
> I would guess there are many cases of solo founders shutting down their business other than founder death... Sure, but it really only makes sense to consider cases where: A) The business has paying customers B) It's very important to the customers that this product remain available C) The founder is unwilling to give or license the source code to those customers In practice, all three of these factors being present…
Software created by solo devs is used by many times fewer people, therefore it’s zero surprise that the total number of displaced customers is lower. You need to calculate the percentages, not hold up anecdotes of not having any rumors.
I don’t see how (C) can reasonably factor into any statistics. I’d love to hear how often you think this matters, but I’m extremely skeptical that shutting down a solo business and giving source to customers has happened enough times to even talk about relative to the number of times that hasn’t happened. I’d like to hear about when giving source to paying customers is even helpful. Depends highly on what kind of software we’re talking about, and depends highly on what kind of customers, but assuming that paying customers can generally do anything with source code seems like a really, really big assumption.