Live data from Hacker News

The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

mjg59.dreamwidth.org

111–120 of 137 posts

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#111
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anything referencing blockchain or cryptocurrencies is a scam. That also applies to the original Signal.

As opposed to what? If referring to Session, nobody refers to it as "the other Signal", lol

The subject of the article is a modified version of Signal called ClearSignal, so most likely that.

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#112

Wikipedia has a good summary for anyone unfamiliar; it's a $120 phone whitelabeled and sold for $500. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umidigi_A9

There's nothing more American than exercising your freedom to be an uninformed consumer and get swindled

"No one ever went bankrupt under-estimating the intelligence of the American public"

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would say that there are scenarios where blockchains are legitimately useful.

Such as?

They are out there, and they aren't necessarily related to crypto [1] [2]

Seriously though, blockchain is an interesting technology. It's a shame it has got such a bad rap because of its ties to cryptocurrency.

[1] https://www.ibm.com/blockchain/use-cases/

[2] https://www.hyperledger.org/learn/case-studies

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Such as?

They are out there, and they aren't necessarily related to crypto [1] [2] Seriously though, blockchain is an interesting technology. It's a shame it has got such a bad rap because of its ties to cryptocurrency. [1] https://www.ibm.com/blockchain/use-cases/ [2] https://www.hyperledger.org/learn/case-studies

None of the "research" and use cases linked need blockchains or are made better by blockchains. These are quite transparent cash grabs while hype is strong.

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are out there, and they aren't necessarily related to crypto [1] [2] Seriously though, blockchain is an interesting technology. It's a shame it has got such a bad rap because of its ties to cryptocurrency. [1] https://www.ibm.com/blockchain/use-cases/ [2] https://www.hyperledger.org/learn/case-studies

None of the "research" and use cases linked need blockchains or are made better by blockchains. These are quite transparent cash grabs while hype is strong.

> None of the "research" and use cases linked need blockchains or are made better by blockchains.

You can read at a speed I could only wish. Kudos.

And of course they don't "need" them. We don't necessarily "need" the cloud, Docker, or web frameworks either, yet here we are. Yes, there could be a new, completely open, distributed database that let multiple users monitor and inspect all historical changes, while allowing some others to make modifications in it.

We could just use Cassandra and build the whole distributed identity and storage infrastructure based on it.

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#117
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Leverging Stupidity ... welcome to my Ted Talk. Hmmm, do you know what ... time to jump on that bandwagon!

Doing what, don't be a tease.

You will have to pay for a ticket to go to the conference. /$

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#118

Wikipedia has a good summary for anyone unfamiliar; it's a $120 phone whitelabeled and sold for $500. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umidigi_A9

Love the irony that the "American Conservative" Freedom phone is just a generic phone from a Chinese tech company...

Yeah, it's so funny to see that people who believe a domestic manufacturing base is important have been so utterly defeated that there's not a single US-made phone they can buy. Well, except the niche Librem 5, but the leaders of the "conservative" movement are mostly swindlers, so they picked a cheap phone they can mark up more.

They lost what they valued, their leaders are selling them out, everybody laugh.

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Love the irony that the "American Conservative" Freedom phone is just a generic phone from a Chinese tech company...

Reminds me of the cooler company Blue Coolers, whose entire business model is that they source from China to compete on price against USA made Yeti coolers. The company almost didn't make it, until they had their big break selling thousands of coolers at a trucker rally. The truckers loved the cheap coolers, even though they are only cheap because they are undercutting USA made coolers with Chinese ones. False consci…

This is interesting and thanks for sharing.

I don’t think it’s accurate to describe Yeti coolers as USA made though: https://www.allamericanmade.com/where-are-yeti-coolers-made/

For USA made, I found Cordova, which I recommend especially because they use a denser foam, so you get more storage capacity for the same exterior dimensions: https://shop.cordovaoutdoors.com/48-qt-adventurer/

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Surely I can't be the only one who finds it incredibly frustrating to see how many people think being republican associated is noteworthy when in the context of scary privacy violations. I think the point of the conversation is that this is a bad privacy product that is being heavily marketed towards (technically) unsophisticated people who subscribe to a specific brand of politics. Those two facts aren't unrelated.…

> marketed towards (technically) unsophisticated people it's being marketed towards gullible people, period. as a conservative programmer, I saw the ad and laughed. it was called out by people in conservative online communities as well.

Yeah there are lots of bitter people in these comments making sweeping generalizations.
Post reply on HN