Live data from Hacker News

Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

journal-doi.org

111–120 of 155 posts

Re: Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

#111

I wonder if the COVID effect will have desensitized people to coughs so the coughgeist is way higher than usual.

How about this (/s): During a pandemic, people are hyper aware of coughing in their environment. It becomes a subconscious trigger (like a baby's cries). Every time a cough occurs in a film, it causes that same shift and elevated processing -- and has the side effect of making a viewer better pay attention/enjoy a scene.

Re: Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

#112
post #107

When I took my AI class, my professor would assign one paper a week and we had to turn in a "critique" of that paper. These papers were, of course, the seminal classics in the field, because what else would you want your intro class to be reading? I complained a bit to the professor that it was a bit silly to critique the seminal papers in the field and if you want to be sure we read it, we could just turn in a summa…

I had to do something similar in a Physics class of mine. We had to write a paper critiquing and arguing against a well known physics theory. I was really into Special Relativity at the time, so picked that one.

My professor was a Nobel laureate, so already pretty intimidating. After we each picked a theory and wrote an outline he asked that we review with him. Well, he said, “I don’t know why you’d pick that. That’s going to be too hard.” So I asked if I could change, but he said that it’s too late for that and wished me luck… I was more than happy with the C+ I got.

Re: Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

#113
post #5

Like most films directed by Dennis Villeneuve I found Dune to be a work of art and visual masterpiece. His recount of how they prepared the set and the scene for the Gom Jabar ritual just shows how commited he is and how much passion he puts into his work. Absolute delight to watch. https://youtu.be/GoAA0sYkLI0

David Lynchs version of it is vastly underrated, Villeneuve's Dune is so much better so! Really looking forward to part two!

The Lynch version deserved all the drubbing it received. Weirding modules, heart plugs, and rain on Arrakis: trampling all over the novel. The exposition by way of overdubbing was horrible too.

Re: Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

#114
post #57
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Arrakis is alien but it's depicted as relatively friendly in the dream-sequences. They used sounds of waves crashing on beaches, which makes a lot of sense as to the Fremen it is their home. My only gripe is that Arrakis doesn't feel hot enough, but I also don't really care.

The Mongolian Gobi desert seems to top out at 27C - https://www.amicusmongolia.com/climate-average-monthly-tempe... (Low of -33C, harsh)

Sure, but in the novel, Arrakis really is hot. In the Appendix, it's stated that the sand surface reached 76.85 Celsius (170.33 F).

Re: Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

#115
post #72
post #16

> Editor’s Note: The claims in this paper have not been verified because the researchers have refused to yield their full dataset and methodology, citing “intellectual property rights,” “the sanctity of the First Amendment,” and “the Wright brothers never had to show their work.” We are publishing their paper here because they won’t stop mailing hard copies in triplicate to our homes and offices. Love it.

But... The Wright brothers did show their work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkpQAGQiv4Q https://www.loc.gov/collections/wilbur-and-orville-wright-pa...

There was a lot of skepticism that their planes were real, even years after they had first flown publicly. Information spread more slowly in those days.

https://generalaviationnews.com/2011/05/09/fliers-or-liars/#....

Re: Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

#116
post #107

When I took my AI class, my professor would assign one paper a week and we had to turn in a "critique" of that paper. These papers were, of course, the seminal classics in the field, because what else would you want your intro class to be reading? I complained a bit to the professor that it was a bit silly to critique the seminal papers in the field and if you want to be sure we read it, we could just turn in a summa…

Had a very similar experience in philosophy classes. The good thing about critiquing seminal works is that there's often a rich body of criticism already available. I found the only way to do well in those classes, since I lacked the mental horsepower to produce my own seminal critiques, was to parrot the literature that was out there already.

Re: Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

#117
post #5

Like most films directed by Dennis Villeneuve I found Dune to be a work of art and visual masterpiece. His recount of how they prepared the set and the scene for the Gom Jabar ritual just shows how commited he is and how much passion he puts into his work. Absolute delight to watch. https://youtu.be/GoAA0sYkLI0

David Lynchs version of it is vastly underrated, Villeneuve's Dune is so much better so! Really looking forward to part two!

> vastly underrated

Sorry but no, it really really isn't.

Just a few highlights:

* Why would soldiers sent to fight on a Desert-Planet wear black, vulcanised, full body rubber Hazmat suits?

* What on Earth is a "Wyrding Module" supposed to be?

* What exactly is achieved by charging into battle while holding a pug on ones arm?

* It says "Ornithopter" in the books, implying something vaguely animal-shaped, not a hovering metal box.

* Why do communication devices in the far future resemble telephones from the early 1900s?

* What exactly was the point of bringing the late-stage navigator to the meeting in a room-sized spice-tank, when his subordinate did all the talking anyway?

Re: Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

#118
post #107

When I took my AI class, my professor would assign one paper a week and we had to turn in a "critique" of that paper. These papers were, of course, the seminal classics in the field, because what else would you want your intro class to be reading? I complained a bit to the professor that it was a bit silly to critique the seminal papers in the field and if you want to be sure we read it, we could just turn in a summa…

Had a very similar experience in philosophy classes. The good thing about critiquing seminal works is that there's often a rich body of criticism already available. I found the only way to do well in those classes, since I lacked the mental horsepower to produce my own seminal critiques, was to parrot the literature that was out there already.

I think in philosophy it's a bit more valid. Still not maybe the best case, since these are still the papers that stood the test of time, critiquing some marginal paper would probably be a better practice of "critiquing", but philosophy always has a critique. The form may be impeccable, the writing may be spectacular, etc., but the philosophy itself always has room for rumination, discussion, etc.

For a science paper, if it's something people are still reading 30-50 years later, it was apparently good enough. I can always critique the paper for failing to solve String Theory and then draw out from String Theory a mathematical demonstration of how their solution for getting robots to navigate around boxes is very good, but that's more a reflection of me than the paper.

Re: Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

#119
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Mongolian Gobi desert seems to top out at 27C - https://www.amicusmongolia.com/climate-average-monthly-tempe... (Low of -33C, harsh)

Sure, but in the novel, Arrakis really is hot. In the Appendix, it's stated that the sand surface reached 76.85 Celsius (170.33 F).

Sand surface =/= ambient temperature, with all the research that went into Dune, I think Herbert was aware of that

Re: Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes

#120
post #27
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lynch-dune is mostly good, but Villeneuve's is so much better in a beautifully indescribable way that only cinema can really do. Villeneuve has been dreaming of making his Dune since he was a boy and it shows. ignoring the visuals, the tone is just so much more ominous and alien than Lynch's. One thing that really dates old movies versus their modern counterparts (of sorts) is the sound design. Dune's sounds are abso…

Dennis Villeneuve has been watching David Lynch's Dune since he was a boy, and it shows. Villeneuve lifted dozens of shots directly from Lynch's version, and relied on the same key scenes as the 1984 Dune. I started out impressed by all the homages to Lynch's Dune, but beyond a certain threshold "homage" becomes "ripoff". In Lynch's the Harkonen's were brutal. In Villeneuve's Dune Gurney had to explain to us that the…

Why Modern Movies Suck - The Soft Reboot https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyU63LJV3AE

Not entirely relevant, but mentions many of the same issues, although presumably there is more about how investors drive some of the outcomes.

Post reply on HN