Live data from Hacker News

Portable replacement for a $60k VO2 Max machine

instructables.com

111–112 of 112 posts

Re: Portable replacement for a $60k VO2 Max machine

#111
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They can, but since the data is very noisy the 3D reconstruction is usually not very good. If you actually need to measure something, analysing the 2D images is much more precise. EDIT: Also, it's really hard to visualise density in a 3D view.

I just don't see what harm there is in making unregulated devices even if they're hard to interpret and less acurate.

The problem with 3D reconstruction being difficult has nothing to do with wether devices are regulated ornot.

Also,noone is stopping you from making a DIY ultrasound and selling it to enthusiasts.

Re: Portable replacement for a $60k VO2 Max machine

#112
post #73

I thought the DIY air-quality monitor earlier today was neat but this blows me away. Some serious next-level hardware hackers this generation. I get worried everyone is turning into dumb iphone+app users but this advanced creation stuff restores faith.

Link to the DIY air-quality monitor?

sorry I missed this question https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29946486

uses a $20 BME680 on a $10 PI, I am really tempted to try it since the standalone sensor for my weather station is like $150

https://www.adafruit.com/product/3660

Post reply on HN