Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It should read: "How Your Boss Would Like You to Quit" Touché, yes there's some truth to this. Many of the points in the post were reflections on people leaving my team as I have an order of magnitude more examples of that than me leaving a team. If you're implying there's some kind of zero-sum thing going on here though, I disagree: it can be good for both you and your boss. > I wonder what their world view is… I…
> Ah, no – this is in the "Don’t sabotage, it’s a dick move" section: it's sabotage which is unethical. I guess the source of the confusion is that you didn't specify what the sabotage actually is. I mean, deleting all your code before leaving is sabotage. Leaving without notice isn't. What did you have in mind when you wrote that? > I don't quite follow this paragraph, could you rephrase? I was highlighting a bunch…
There are three main sections in the article:
- Your reasons for leaving shouldn’t be a surprise to your boss
- Match your notice period to the handover period
- Set the team up to flourish without you
The "don't sabotage" subsection is under the "Set the team up to flourish without you" section, not the "Match your notice period to the handover period" section.
Seems fairly common sense that the author did not intend to conflate lack of notice with sabotage, considering that the subject of sabotage is completely independent and separate from the section relating to notice.