Live data from Hacker News

Raspberry Pi Colocation

pi-colocation.com

111–120 of 149 posts

Re: Raspberry Pi Colocation

#111
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can attach a big ass SSD to this and still pay just $6 a month. This is unique I think. I wonder how they would feel if you add your custom electronics to the Pi's GPIO connector.

I don't see how much use you would get out of a 2TB or 4TB SATA SSD attached to a raspberry pi if the network is locked at 10Mbps throughput.

A use case with that bandwidth is shipping them a disk with a full backup and rsyncing the incrementals day by day.

Re: Raspberry Pi Colocation

#113
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait, renting is more than a dollar cheaper than colocating?

they rent you a docker debian instance on a pi, not full pi

> Dedicated Raspberry Pi 4 Model B

> No additional virtualization aside from Docker

So docker is involved but you get a pi all to yourself. Does that make it so much easier to manage that they can pay for the pi themselves and still have much lower costs?

And you get an IP too??

Re: Raspberry Pi Colocation

#114
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was hoping they'd have a DC power supply per rack, but their FAQ makes it clear that this is not the case. Bit of a missed opportunity there. Handling heterogeneous power supplies sounds like a nightmare.

What a bummer. Something like an 80PLUS Platinum ATX PC PSU could do around 40 amps on the 5V rails. Redundant server PSUs seem like an obvious choice here.

So much of a computer PSU is dedicated to 12 volts, though. I can get a 5V 60A supply for $27 and save a lot of unnecessary complexity.

Though either way you might be better off with a series of USB hubs.

Re: Raspberry Pi Colocation

#115
post #42
post #27

While I completely understand the allure of running on your own hardware, if you just want a cheap server to host a personal page or similar, you cannot beat Scaleway's Stardust VM instances. For less than 2 EUR a month you get 1 vCPU, 1 GB of RAM, 1 IPv4+IPv6 address, 10GB of storage and unlimited traffic. They claim up-to 100Mbps bandwidth but I regularly get much more than that. This sounds like a commercial but I…

I think local hardware makes sense for LAN-only sites - e.g. a company wiki, a media center or a file storage with web interface. For anything that is supposed to be visible on the internet, I'd always use a hosted server - if nothing else, because I really don't want to open an ingress into my personal home network, even if my ISP permitted that. For use-cases were you have to handle certain incoming requests even t…

That pagekite looks handy! I’ve recently got gigabit fiber at home but my routers ipv6 firewall is crap. This seems easier than just making a custom vpn to a cloud instance.

Re: Raspberry Pi Colocation

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a bummer. Something like an 80PLUS Platinum ATX PC PSU could do around 40 amps on the 5V rails. Redundant server PSUs seem like an obvious choice here.

So much of a computer PSU is dedicated to 12 volts, though. I can get a 5V 60A supply for $27 and save a lot of unnecessary complexity. Though either way you might be better off with a series of USB hubs.

Could usb hubs introduce security issues for the hosts?

Re: Raspberry Pi Colocation

#117
post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So much of a computer PSU is dedicated to 12 volts, though. I can get a 5V 60A supply for $27 and save a lot of unnecessary complexity. Though either way you might be better off with a series of USB hubs.

Could usb hubs introduce security issues for the hosts?

For USB power? I don't think there should be any way for Pis plugged into the same freestanding hub to talk to each other, but if so you could prevent that with power-only cables.

Re: Raspberry Pi Colocation

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a bummer. Something like an 80PLUS Platinum ATX PC PSU could do around 40 amps on the 5V rails. Redundant server PSUs seem like an obvious choice here.

So much of a computer PSU is dedicated to 12 volts, though. I can get a 5V 60A supply for $27 and save a lot of unnecessary complexity. Though either way you might be better off with a series of USB hubs.

Sure, that would make more sense than a giant power bar with a dozen 5V wall warts.

Re: Raspberry Pi Colocation

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agree, a central supply with a 3A MOSFET for control and a PTC for basic protection would give a lot more functionality and reduce customer downtime and smart-hands touches.

At that point what you're describing has little resemblance to a hosted RPI though, the complexity justifies just making something custom that's better suited to the task than shoe horning Raspberry Pi hardware into a rack.

I can unplug and re-plug in my physical raspi. If I'm renting a remote raspi, I expect the same ability to do so.

Re: Raspberry Pi Colocation

#120
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I fix this by running a script on a cron job that updates dns records based on my current ip, using cloudfront to only allow known ips through my ufw rules. It doesn't work for 100% uptime, but I've never had an instance where visiting my domain failed. It may not work if you're running a tor node, depending on how cloudfront deals with them, but it does work for mostly-reliable dns resolution on a non-static, reside…

> alternative for people that want a static ip without renting vps/metal How do you think Cloudfront works? Amazon is just selling you a bunch of VMs pre-configured as load balancers. Not trying to be a jerk here, but the cloud has really caused otherwise smart people to lose a grasp on reality.

I wrote Cloudfront but meant Cloudflare. My bad.

I have a script that updates the dns record on a free tier plan with Cloudflare, and since traffic passes through them I can open my residential network to only ports 80 and 443 from their ip4/6 addresses.

Post reply on HN