Live data from Hacker News

$1M bounty for details on Tether’s backing

hindenburgresearch.com

111–120 of 326 posts

Re: $1M bounty for details on Tether’s backing

#111
post #2

This is very interesting. Hindenburg is the real deal. One challenge may be that, like the Mafia, Tether keeps its inner circle and employs family members. They have ~15 employees for a 70 billion dollar operation. The CTO’s wife is a manager, and the CEO’s daughter works for an unnamed crypto family office, which may be related. Their counterparties in Chinese commercial paper may not know they are counterparties du…

[deleted]

Re: $1M bounty for details on Tether’s backing

#112
post #98
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a terrible target to short as you can only do it through exchanges that deal in Tether. Exchanges that can manipulate your position and liquidate you if they feel like it. Exchanges that benefit from Tether existing.

Tether is pervasive in DeFi. You could borrow Tether through a smart contract, exchange for another stable or asset. Pay the interest until it collapses in the future and, buy back worthless Tether cheap to pay off loan and get collateral back.

The danger is that the smart contract you borrow from becomes insolvent and you lose your collateral. This becomes way more likely if Tether/crypto is crashing. Some of them are more prone to that than others, I'm sure, but all of them require collateral > the amount you borrow, so the risk is large.

Re: $1M bounty for details on Tether’s backing

#114
post #108

It may be counterintuitive, but the best thing that could happen to Bitcoin would be for Tether to collapse in a cloud of dust. Tether is continually cited as a large risk factor to Bitcoin by people who have gotten past the "it's not real money" objection. But I think it's worth considering what happens if the collapse never comes. If government investigation, findings of wrongdoing, admission of lies, and punishmen…

> It may be counterintuitive, but the best thing that could happen to Bitcoin would be for Tether to collapse in a cloud of dust.

I share your opinion, and especially true if you have a ~5 year horizon on BTCUSD.

Re: $1M bounty for details on Tether’s backing

#115

But... does it ultimately matter? All the other sh*tcoins are backed against nothing and have huge market caps as well.

It’s different because Tether claims to hold 1 USD for each Tether. A claim that should be verifiable. The value of sh*tcoins is just a function of their future resale value.

They claim to hold assets with values equivalent to 1 USD / Tether. Different than holding the USD directly.

They provide a more detailed breakdown here: https://tether.to/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/tether_assuranc...

About half in commercial paper and CODs. A quarter in t-bills. 2B in unspecified "digital tokens".

Re: $1M bounty for details on Tether’s backing

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you induce them to violate an NDA, yes, it could be. Is violating an NDA illegal ? I'm not a lawyer and I don't play one on TV, but I don't think violating an NDA is illegal as in you could go to prison for violating a law. Yes, it could open you up to legal jeopardy as in a lawsuit which could be expensive, but I don't think any laws are violated. And if you're violating an NDA to expose some corrupt practices…

Never thought about this, but I guess you might be on the hook for fraud if you violated an agreement for profit. That is, an employee violating an NDA for profit might be considered committing fraud against their employer. It's strange - Tether seems shady but I don't think Hindenburg's offer is on firm ethical or legal ground. What if Hindenberg offered $1M for access to a private list of donors to a [prominent abo…

An NDA would be a civil matter, I would think. It is a remedy for monetary damages, right?

Of course I have no idea if offering someone a large sum of money to violate any kind of contract is in any way illegal or even actionable in civil law since the person can always refuse the money and uphold their contract. If it made you criminally liable, wouldn’t every job offer to someone under contract with a competitor lend you in jail?

IANAL so offer money to break NDAs at your own risk.

Re: $1M bounty for details on Tether’s backing

#117
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Even if the origin, operation of Tether is highly suspicious: if it functions, is widely adopted and does what is expected … may last longer than people think. I think you're right about this point, and I've been trying to imagine what might cause Tether to collapse - you really need a run on the bank situation triggered by something causing them to become insolvent.

A run on a bank can make it insolvent? I thought that insolvency was when they don't have the assets to cover their liabilities. My understanding of a bank run is it happens when a bank is solvent, but doesn't have enough in reserves - liquid, short term assets. But if they simply don't have at least 100% of their liabilities in assets, then they are bust because they can never pay people back barring a miracle.

Insolvent literally means liabilities exceed assets. There are various ways a company can trade while insolvent, including being a Ponzi scheme.

Re: $1M bounty for details on Tether’s backing

#118
post #2

This is very interesting. Hindenburg is the real deal. One challenge may be that, like the Mafia, Tether keeps its inner circle and employs family members. They have ~15 employees for a 70 billion dollar operation. The CTO’s wife is a manager, and the CEO’s daughter works for an unnamed crypto family office, which may be related. Their counterparties in Chinese commercial paper may not know they are counterparties du…

>Hindenburg is the real deal. Hindenburg is not the real deal. If you think Hindenburg is the real deal you should pay closer attention to their activities. They (he) are one of a number of noisy short sellers who try to drive stock prices with their tweets/reports. SEC should be doing things to these people. That said, he is probably right about Tether. Tether should make every crypto speculator or holder very nervo…

They were right about Nikola and Lordstown Motors.

I’m a Hinden-believer I suppose

Re: $1M bounty for details on Tether’s backing

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess it's actually his real name, and Zeke short for Ezekiel isn't uncommon. But Zeke can also mean 'cloak'.

Christ this may as well be numerology.

Just a hop skip away from Q

Re: $1M bounty for details on Tether’s backing

#120
post #2

This is very interesting. Hindenburg is the real deal. One challenge may be that, like the Mafia, Tether keeps its inner circle and employs family members. They have ~15 employees for a 70 billion dollar operation. The CTO’s wife is a manager, and the CEO’s daughter works for an unnamed crypto family office, which may be related. Their counterparties in Chinese commercial paper may not know they are counterparties du…

>Hindenburg is the real deal. Hindenburg is not the real deal. If you think Hindenburg is the real deal you should pay closer attention to their activities. They (he) are one of a number of noisy short sellers who try to drive stock prices with their tweets/reports. SEC should be doing things to these people. That said, he is probably right about Tether. Tether should make every crypto speculator or holder very nervo…

Oh? Why should the SEC do anything? If it's wrong to talk about a company in hopes of affecting the stock price, shouldn't Elon Musk be doing hard time?
Post reply on HN