Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, how exactly do you "seize" cryptocurrency without hard forking it?
They send it to another wallet/account that they control. Not hard to understand.
What does one do for Bitcoin, short of a hard fork?
111–120 of 296 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, how exactly do you "seize" cryptocurrency without hard forking it?
They send it to another wallet/account that they control. Not hard to understand.
What does one do for Bitcoin, short of a hard fork?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Save face" for whom? It wasn't the US gov who got hacked or paid the ransom, it was the Colonial Pipeline Company.
The US Judicial system which tries to flex its "unlimited" reach.
51% attacks don’t allow for withdrawing funds from an account - only for rolling back recent transactions
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah Elliptic and Chainanalysis make all their money by convincing people that all transfers are of the same Ultimate Beneficial Owner until it hits an exchange As long as the ignorance stays high, they get government contracts
That's utter bs, exchanges generates unique BIP32 addresses for deposit. There isn't a master exchanges key used among all customers.
Genuinely curious why you think your response was related or even mutually exclusive
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They send it to another wallet/account that they control. Not hard to understand.
And if they don't send? With electronically stored fiat, the feds can just ask the bank to give them the money right out of their account, and I'm sure the banks would cooperate. With paper cash they can just hold their arm while the SWAT team go on a rampage through their bedsheets for the cash. What does one do for Bitcoin, short of a hard fork?
I am guessing that the key pair generation process was faulty. The FBI found an exploit in a wallet used by the hackers allowing the private key to be predicted. The prefix is bc1,which is uncommon. A few weeks ago there was such a vulnerability with Cake Wallet. Or they installed malware on the hacker's computers and were able to log the private key as it was generated. Or the hackers foolishly stored the key pairs…
This story makes absolutely no sense at all. The errors present by these hackers are so comical it's simply unbelievable. I'm supposed to believe some elite Russian hacking group keeps their crypto wallets running on a US host where the FBI just logs right in and snatches the private key? I'm starting to entertain the conspiracies that the future of commodities price manipulation is fake ransomware attacks. There nee…
It always struck me as improbable that all these high profile (and notoriously hard/impossible to attribute) attacks on “critical infrastructure” or whatever are always instantly and authoritatively pinned (by US authorities) on groups operating in the US’s geopolitical enemies. “Russian hackers” once again, eh?
This story makes absolutely no sense at all. The errors present by these hackers are so comical it's simply unbelievable. I'm supposed to believe some elite Russian hacking group keeps their crypto wallets running on a US host where the FBI just logs right in and snatches the private key? I'm starting to entertain the conspiracies that the future of commodities price manipulation is fake ransomware attacks. There nee…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The press release specifically mentions that the cryptocurrency was seized through FBI having posession of the private key.
As someone who has been on the receiving end of federal seizure orders for cryptocurrency private keys, they were in my case satisfied by publishing a transfer (signature) to a USG address, not actual disclosure of private key material, despite that being explicitly stated in the order.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And if they don't send? With electronically stored fiat, the feds can just ask the bank to give them the money right out of their account, and I'm sure the banks would cooperate. With paper cash they can just hold their arm while the SWAT team go on a rampage through their bedsheets for the cash. What does one do for Bitcoin, short of a hard fork?
In crypto „seizing” means getting access to the wallet and sending funds to the one that gov’t has under it’s sole control
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. Until DOJ provides proof, this is pure FUD. Anyone competent enough to extort a foreign company out of millions is not going to attempt to cash out through an exchange.
Are you saying the government didn’t actually recover the money that they claim to have recovered?