Earlier quoted context omitted.
What happens when there is a major earthquake in the bay area though? Not being geographically dispersed seems like a large risk.
They have backups in Canada and Egypt.
Internet Archive Infrastructure
111–114 of 114 posts
Re: Internet Archive Infrastructure
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
The original comment was "the Archive is painfully slow", the reply to that was "for me it's always quite fast", so I gave it some actual hard data explaining that 90s is in fact quite slow and maybe even painfully so in 2021. I have absolutely no idea how you got from that discussion to a hypothetical where the Archive doesn't exist. Obviously 90s is better than it not existing. I even said in my comment that it was…
> Why did you even make this comment? I find it crass to gripe about Archive being slow. It's still much better than nothing. If folks want it to be faster than can donate rather than gripe, eh?
Re: Internet Archive Infrastructure
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why did you even make this comment? I find it crass to gripe about Archive being slow. It's still much better than nothing. If folks want it to be faster than can donate rather than gripe, eh?
I wasn't griping, I was responding to someone saying they had no speed issues. I donate $5/mo and have done for years, thanks for asking.
Good for you. Seriously (no joke, no sarcasm.) Good for you, that's awesome. (And yeah, that was the obvious question: "Have you tried giving them money?" but I wasn't feeling quite that salty.)
Well met. Sorry for being a grouch.
Re: Internet Archive Infrastructure
#114Probably a good place to ask: is there a reason why Wayback Machine's archives often take forever to load? Most of content on IA loads pretty fast, so WB is a notable exception.