Earlier quoted context omitted.
What percent of the electricity used by Bitcoin miners is generated by fossil fuels? My impression is that most miners are located to take advantage of locales with very cheap hydroelectric/geothermal or take advantage of subsidized/overbuilt renewables. But I could be wrong. Any data on this?
Hydro and geothermal aren't without environmental cost. They don't destroy the whole world but can be fairly destructive locally. If you're going to flood a valley, please make it for something actually worthwile.
Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future
111–120 of 1001 posts
Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future
#112That's not good for the environment.
Tesla is not about being good for the env. It's about making money. Same thing with SpaceX not being about going to Mars. It's about making money too! The going to Mars/ good for env stories are to get some public goodwill behind them from a certain crowd.
Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future
#113Soon, a nation might realistically buy $100 B + of bitcoin and declare it a national currency.
Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future
#114I don't understand all the Crypto hate on this site. Since when have hackers become the luddites to new ways of finance?
Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future
#115Legitimizing Bitcoin more than offsets the environmental benefits of electric vehicles.
All EV's are worse for the environment than buying a used Petrol car.
A fair assessment would be a new BEV versus a new petrol versus a new diesel versus a new hybrid.
Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future
#116In a way, buying Bitcoin is a bet on the timing of quantum computing.
Note that there are cryptographers out there working on blockchains that are quantum resistant: David Chaum for example and its "xx" blockchain (which is still in beta but already has a few hundreds nodes running).
Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future
#117Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future
#1182020 has completely changed my perception of Tesla and Musk. I had this image of a benevolent genius who is sometimes misunderstood ("funding secured", "pedo guy", "Autopilot"). Came across Teslacharts' podcast [1] (now the Chartcast) and oh boy was I wrong. This is only the latest in a long series of red flags around Tesla/Musk and however it ends, it will not end well. [1] https://thechartcast.com/
Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future
#119So this is legal and ok to do: - You buy a lot of bitcoin personally. - Then as a CEO you make your company invest in bitcoin. Make it news. Prices go up. - You've made a lot of money for yourself.
Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
What percent of the electricity used by Bitcoin miners is generated by fossil fuels? My impression is that most miners are located to take advantage of locales with very cheap hydroelectric/geothermal or take advantage of subsidized/overbuilt renewables. But I could be wrong. Any data on this?
There are many who mine on subsidized fosil fuel. Especially in argentinia.