Live data from Hacker News

New MacBook Pro models to feature magsafe, no touch bar and more ports: analyst

macrumors.com

111–120 of 474 posts

Re: New MacBook Pro models to feature magsafe, no touch bar and more ports: analyst

#111
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I changed Caps Lock to work as ESC and I'll never go back.

I did this too, one downside though is that it's become such muscle memory for me at this point that using someone else's computer always results in my hitting caps lock instead of escape the first few times.

Yeah, that's the unfortunate downside. But it hasn't really happened to me since last March for some reason.

Re: New MacBook Pro models to feature magsafe, no touch bar and more ports: analyst

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, essentially a cable whose terminal endpoint is like https://www.geeky-gadgets.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Mag...

The only problem with that is that it won't be able to reliably carry Thunderbolt 4 speeds. Most of those connectors are "USB-C" which is achievable, but I haven't seen any (verified) Thunderbolt 3 magnetic connectors, even. That's important for Pro Display XDR users, or Thunderbolt dock users, who only use one cable to plug their Macbook in (power+thunderbolt). Or, screw it, we end up with a charging only breakway U…

I don't think that the existing Apple charging cables work as Thunderbolt cables.

Re: New MacBook Pro models to feature magsafe, no touch bar and more ports: analyst

#115
post #97
post #66

If anyone from Apple is reading, let me just say – this is exactly what I want. Magsafe charging. Function keys instead of the touchbar. 15-16" screen. M1 CPU. 32GB Memory. I also prefer the 2015 keyboard, but it's not a dealbreaker. I'll pay for the kickstarter now if it means it'll come out in the next 18 months. Please make it happen.

This is one of the most profitable businesses on the planet (large margins / overpriced products on a giant volume), they really don't need or care about any kickstarter. You want to influence the company - get > $200B worth of shares to agree with you and then get a board seat. Anything else won't matter (and even then it won't be easy due to the track record of current management). Edit: Anyone care to explain what…

[deleted]

Re: New MacBook Pro models to feature magsafe, no touch bar and more ports: analyst

#116
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only problem with that is that it won't be able to reliably carry Thunderbolt 4 speeds. Most of those connectors are "USB-C" which is achievable, but I haven't seen any (verified) Thunderbolt 3 magnetic connectors, even. That's important for Pro Display XDR users, or Thunderbolt dock users, who only use one cable to plug their Macbook in (power+thunderbolt). Or, screw it, we end up with a charging only breakway U…

I don't think that the existing Apple charging cables work as Thunderbolt cables.

Good point, that is true.

Re: New MacBook Pro models to feature magsafe, no touch bar and more ports: analyst

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For someone who has worked as a travelling consultant for almost ten years, I couldn't care less about thinness. Obviously I don't want to carry any bricks around. But the thickness of 2013 models was totally fine for me. It allows for even more battery packs and room for cooling, as well as an Ethernet port. Shocking. There used to be laptops that actually included Ethernet ports, without any Thunderbolt dongles, th…

Personally I think the versions with 4 USB type-C ports are great and can't wait for peripheral devices to catch up; several versatile ports is much better overall than the mishmash of different types of special-purpose ports for peripherals, displays, networking, charging. Anything that needs a particular legacy port can be done just fine via dongle. It is unfortunate that some laptops have only 2 USB type-C ports t…

> The batteries are bottlenecked on FAA limits

passengers may also carry up to two spare larger lithium ion batteries (101-160 Wh) https://www.faa.gov/hazmat/packsafe/more_info/?hazmat=7

100Wh internal battery like the 16” MBPB + 2x160Wh, I don’t see an issue with FAA rules.

Re: New MacBook Pro models to feature magsafe, no touch bar and more ports: analyst

#118
If the assertions regarding the fully-flat design are true, there is hope that this new model will resemble the greatest portable Mac of the 21st century: the PowerBook G4.

For the uninitiated, watch the video of Steve Jobs announcing it at MacWorld San Francisco 2001.

Re: New MacBook Pro models to feature magsafe, no touch bar and more ports: analyst

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yes, but also the damn trackpad. I feel like i'm getting carpal tunnel just trying to avoid swiping the damn thing with my palm it's so freaking huge. Been 3+ years still feels like it's designed specifically to get in the way of my work.

I always thought Macbook touchpad is too damn big and awkward to use. But here, it seems, people are in love with it.

I hear you. I have the same thoughts. Touchpads on most laptops have sufficed for my use. People swear by the touchpad on Macbooks, but to me it never really was that big of an improvement. My bias could be due to the fact that I don't use the touchpad exclusively and always attach a mouse when I can.

Re: New MacBook Pro models to feature magsafe, no touch bar and more ports: analyst

#120
post #66

If anyone from Apple is reading, let me just say – this is exactly what I want. Magsafe charging. Function keys instead of the touchbar. 15-16" screen. M1 CPU. 32GB Memory. I also prefer the 2015 keyboard, but it's not a dealbreaker. I'll pay for the kickstarter now if it means it'll come out in the next 18 months. Please make it happen.

yes, but also the damn trackpad. I feel like i'm getting carpal tunnel just trying to avoid swiping the damn thing with my palm it's so freaking huge. Been 3+ years still feels like it's designed specifically to get in the way of my work.

Odd, I rest my palm on mine all the time without issue. I believe it has palm detection and is smart enough to ignore the larger surface area of your hand.
Post reply on HN