Earlier quoted context omitted.
> people like the smell and aesthetic (note this article is in just about the most middle-class publication there is in the UK) The problem here and described in the article is that people are not using direct vent stoves/fireplaces. What is being talking about are units that vent out a chimney/flue, but take the air for combustion from the house itself. This is not what you want for health or efficiency reasons. Wha…
> Also a useful hint: if you're going to use one in a domicile where you live for long periods of time, it may be worth looking at soapstone designs, as they retain heat more (though warm up is longer) Why would that matter? The amount of heat transferred to the living space is the same. I can see the benefit of radiating some residual heat when not active (for example, through the night) but that seems to be offset…
Also, even if the fire goes out you'll get some residual heat and so you have some time to get it going again. This may not be a big deal at 0C, but if it's -20C outside then it may be a higher priority.
From various reviews I've read, the heat 'feels' different: not as intense but rather 'softer' and 'even'.