Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if it would be profitable for Visa/Mastercard/Discover/AmEx to sell a verification service where people can authenticate with a $0.01 authorization or approval amount. Obviously, it wouldn't work with gift cards or other accounts not tied to a real person.
The answer to card fraud is called Strong Customer Authentication and it's a requirement under PSD2. It requires payment service providers to obtain a second factor for authentication. This might be an online banking login and approval, device data capture or an SMS one time code. How is up to the card provider.
Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone
111–120 of 403 posts
Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you think iPhone users care if it’s harder for Facebook and the like to catch fraud?
I'll flip this one back to you in the same spirit. Do you think iPhone users care that Apple is implementing anti-tracking?
Sent from my iPhone
Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone
#113Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
> shameful that a device that is marketed as the gold standard in privacy It's being marketed this way, that's it. It doesn't mean Apple care about privacy, and they prove every once in a while that they don't respect anyone's privacy at all. They spy on their users as much as anyone else (and overall, they have access to much more information than everybody else except Google). All they want to do is prevent third-p…
They only share data with partners at the direction of users and only to provide specific services, and use for marketing is banned. That privacy policy?
Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone
#115Support Free software instead, and stop begging Apple for permission to control what happens on hardware you own.
I don't want to own hardware and OS I don't like, even if I can control it fully. I'd rather have hardware and OS I like, even if I can't control some aspects of it. Of course a hardware/OS I like and which I control fully would be the holy grail (if the tradeoffs involved, e.g. it being FOSS, and thus underfunded for example, allowed for such a thing). Absent that, somewhere in between there is a nice balance for ea…
Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
What specific steps do they take to stop tracking?
https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Freque...
Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
You missed out the third option, which is ads relevent to the content they’re embedded in. This metaphor worked from 300 years ago through to 15 years ago with no problems.
Or the fourth one, no ads? I might be the minority but ads are wasted on me anyway (apart from the annoyance of seeing them).
Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you think iPhone users care if it’s harder for Facebook and the like to catch fraud?
I'll flip this one back to you in the same spirit. Do you think iPhone users care that Apple is implementing anti-tracking?
Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
They only share data with partners at the direction of users and only to provide specific services, and use for marketing is banned. That privacy policy?
and Chinese iCloud with Chinese government...
And it's not gonna change: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-fbi-icloud-exclusiv...
Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you think iPhone users care if it’s harder for Facebook and the like to catch fraud?
That's not what the GP is saying. They're saying that only Facebook and the like have the resources to catch fraud, and smaller players won't. Yes, it's harder, but that hardness is almost an irrelevance to Facebook and other FAANG-alikes, whereas it could be much more of a problem for smaller businesses who will struggle to bear the costs both of fraud, and to develop anti-fraud solutions (or pay for anti-fraud serv…