Live data from Hacker News

Casio F-91W: The strangely ubiquitous watch (2011)

bbc.com

111–120 of 227 posts

Re: Casio F-91W: The strangely ubiquitous watch (2011)

#112
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Surely every jacket, and not just the one?

Just like underwear and pants, why would you ever need more than one jacket?

Do underwear have two pockets if the pocket is accessible from the inside and outside?

Re: Casio F-91W: The strangely ubiquitous watch (2011)

#114
post #15

I bought a gshock about 16 years ago when going through military training - during the time I had two other watches stop working. The watch has been in some harsh conditions and has taking a beating, its worn down to the point you can no longer read the text captions, but you can still read the time perfectly, all functionality works, even the light, and its still on the original battery.

I bought a gshock and traded it for food in a training area in the philippines. Now I have a Bertucci.

What did you trade the good for?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_red_paperclip

Re: Casio F-91W: The strangely ubiquitous watch (2011)

#115
post #44

The "cheap" Casios run on the fumes of their old fame and retro nostalgia. I'd say the modern day equivalent would be a $20 waterproof fitness band like a Xiaomi Mi Band. They are basically uncompetitive today, unlike they were initially. Here they are literally more expensive than a band with a color display, bluetooth and various sensors.

Only that your Bluetooth band needs to be charged several times a month.

It's rare that I would ever be away from a charger for more than a week. That said, if I ever get to through hike the PCT, I'll be picking up one of these cheap Casios as a sanity check for time until sunrise/sunset.

Re: Casio F-91W: The strangely ubiquitous watch (2011)

#116

SKMEI make a clone: https://skmei.com/products-item/skmei-digial-sport-watches-l... It has an excellent backlight and I regularly wear it swimming without any problems so far.

Why would you not just get the original?

The original's backlight is not great: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23972526

Re: Casio F-91W: The strangely ubiquitous watch (2011)

#117

SKMEI make a clone: https://skmei.com/products-item/skmei-digial-sport-watches-l... It has an excellent backlight and I regularly wear it swimming without any problems so far.

Why would you not just get the original?

China is kinda anti-Japanese, maybe that's why?

Re: Casio F-91W: The strangely ubiquitous watch (2011)

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unless you lost it or damaged it (drop, water, excessive scratches, etc, etc.) or it fell too much out of style. I suspect most 50 dollar watches don't last anywhere near 30 years in real life usage.

A gshock would very likely last 30 years in pretty much any usage situation.

"Lost it" is a real life usage situation for a watch and we don't yet have watches that return back to the owner on command.

Re: Casio F-91W: The strangely ubiquitous watch (2011)

#120

The "cheap" Casios run on the fumes of their old fame and retro nostalgia. I'd say the modern day equivalent would be a $20 waterproof fitness band like a Xiaomi Mi Band. They are basically uncompetitive today, unlike they were initially. Here they are literally more expensive than a band with a color display, bluetooth and various sensors.

I am looking for a modest looking, slim watch with a dot matrix display. It shouldn't have any spying, surveillance built in. Closest to this requirement are some Seiko watches from the 80/90, but these are quite expensive.

I like the metal casios that are same size as F-91W: https://www.casio.com/products/watches/classic/a158wa-1 https://www.casio.com/products/watches/classic/a700w-1a

I've got a few various styles of, more or less, the same watch.

Post reply on HN