Live data from Hacker News

At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

theguardian.com

111–120 of 287 posts

Re: At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you're right - according to category theory, only relationships of the objects matter, not the objects themselves.

I wonder if you're joking or not.

It’s actually somewhat profound and fitting if you read it without cynicism.

Re: At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

#112

The nicest bit for me was where he talked about growing old being a privilege and not to lament every grey hair and wrinkle. Puts it in perspective.

As I often say, "Growing old sucks, but it is better than the alternative."* *I can't take credit. I got it from someone else, but I don't remember who.

My grandfather says this, and meets his age with a reverent smile. It's so unburdening to embrace age. The fear of it is encompassing and I feel it on the edge of my mind at times.

But it is _so_ incredibly liberating to meet it with a warm smile and acceptance.

Age is not a punishment, it's a gift, a privilege, to carry the memories we have and to wear our lives on our face like we're able to.

Re: At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

#113
post #13

"Mostly it is loss which teaches us about the worth of things." -- Arthur Schopenhauer

So if I never loose my money it is worthless! Ha! Sorry, no. It is our attachment to things that determine their worth.

Technically money that is never spent (lost) is kind of worthless tho

Re: At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

#114
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As I often say, "Growing old sucks, but it is better than the alternative."* *I can't take credit. I got it from someone else, but I don't remember who.

I’ve heard it ascribed to Oscar Wilde, although according to Whistler he probably stole it from someone himself.

It's clearly been around a lot longer than I realized!

Re: At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

#115
"Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted — in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word."

-- Arthur Schopenhauer

Re: At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

#116
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So true. Even in the best case scenario if they manage to revive you perpetually, the universe will eventually end and then you'll be there to experience it... For someone who is afraid of dying, I can't think of a worse way to go. To an atheist, uncertainty is the source of all hope.

>To an atheist, uncertainty is the source of all hope. Isn't that somewhat backward? To an atheist, the certainty that they won't be going to an afterlife seems to be a source of hope, and for the religious person, the idea that they might is the same.

I don't know about other atheists, but I get some comfort knowing that the universe will continue to exist long after I die. I don't believe that there is a god but that doesn't rule out the possibility of some kind of afterlife or reincarnation or alternative form of consciousness. There are still a lot of possibilities on the table and these possibilities are a source of hope.

When you think that your consciousness is special, irreplaceable and irreproducible, death becomes a lot more frightening.

On the other hand, if you believe, based on empirical evidence, that your consciousness can be manufactured out of a piece of meat with some chemicals and electricity as the result of a totally random natural process (evolution), that gives a lot of hope.

Re: At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

#117
rawls' social utility theory stated that by maximizing the welfare of the worst-off person, you improve all of society; at the time i learned it it seemed like a strange idea.

but then i thought: every moment in your life can be valued according to how much life you have ahead of it. the present moment is the most valuable; and the very last moment, the least -- you have nothing ahead of it. i thought: if you live your life such that the last moment, which is the least valuable in that sense, is as good as possible -- perhaps that would improve the totality of the rest of your life.

this has all been covered by the buddhist concepts on this thread but i thought it was interesting that we can come to this same idea somewhat independently. (maybe rawls was inspired by buddhism? i don't know.)

Re: At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

#118

“All that is mine, beloved and pleasing, will become otherwise and will become separated from me”— Siddhartha Gautama. As a Buddhist we do “contemplation of death” meditation on a regular basis. It involves imagining our last few hours on our deathbed. It is a wonderful exercise to help put things in context. It makes you behave differently towards people you meet, even strangers.

Sometimes, when I talk to my 4 year old son, I imagine how we will have our last goodbye talk on my death bed. How we will both know that this is the last moment together, how we both will be mourning.

It makes me incredibly sad, and, at the same time it helps me to make better decisions in life. Choosing spending time with him instead of surfing the web for no reason for example.

Re: At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

#119
I'd like someone to explain to me why this is on the front page of HN. Personally, I didn't find any remarkable insight in the article and the author seems like quite an average person with average advice. My best guess is that people have upvoted this out of sympathy for a dying man, or perhaps they want to make space for discussing premature death. Which for me begs the question, exactly what is HN all about?

Re: At 31, I have just weeks to live. Here's what I want to pass on

#120

"Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted — in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word." -- Arthur Schopenhauer

What are you trying to accomplish, here? Do you think the quote you responded to was wrong? Do you think no one should ever quote Schopenhauer? Something else?

Being more straightforward about your criticism would be fair.

Post reply on HN