Live data from Hacker News

Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

inquirer.com

111–120 of 325 posts

Re: Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

#111

This is problematic to voting in the same way closing polling sites is, framed as cost cutting or inefficiency reduction with the intention of reducing access to a subset of the population. This is just frustration, but the fact that we could pass a massive defense bill (again, I know), but are unable to fund basic services shows the integrity of our government. Moreover, it shows the culpability of most of the elect…

> Moreover, it shows the culpability of most of the elected officials, from both parties. It shows that after the labor movement was destroyed, the only material base for the Democratic Party was to go looking for money from the same people who give it to Republicans. Saying we don’t need a labor movement is equivalent to saying “we don’t need a political party that relies on support from workers.”

If I may, I'll add a correction to your quoted statement to give my intended meaning: “we don’t need a political party that relies only on support from workers.”

The subdivision and segregation of American political movements has been an incredibly useful tool in defusing them. The labor, civil rights, suffrage, identity movements, were powerful, but the lack of intersectionality made it so that once policy victories were achieved the tenor died down. My comment was focused on how this was a fundamental weakness.

For example, is voting by mail a "labor" issue? I would say no, and even if this opinion is generally wrong it shows the subdivision that occurs. There is no modern suffrage movement in the same way as existed in the early part of the 1900s. The idea of a "people's movement" is to say we need a political party that relies on the people, not kleptocrats, not lawyers, not donors, and fights for issues that are relevant to those people.

I didn't march in the recent protests because I am black, because I've felt fear from the police, because I've been systemically oppressed. Most of my peers didn't either, and the ones who were subject to those oppressions, among many others, are far braver than me, and for that I feel empathy. And for that we should march. These are issues of "people" because that's the most common denominator, not because we're excluding the factors.

The underlying thread of what I said is that we need a movement that relies on the common empathy we have for each other. I want community. I want justice. I want to love my neighbor, as myself. I want you to pray to your god while I mine, even if mine is just a nice bike ride on a Sunday morning.

And I know cynics, rightfully jaded by their lives, will probably say I'm being hopeful, youthful, naive. And I accept all of these, but I'd rather be those than have what we have today, what a simple cross to carry.

I guess I just want to listen to John Lenin's Imagine and feel like he's talking about my world. And I'm not the only one.

Re: Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Retirement benefits should be funded as they are accrued. That is not the problem. The problem is the USPS doesn’t have the power to price their products appropriately in order to pay for their expenses (including payroll which includes retirement benefits). If anything, all entities promising retirement benefits should be forced to do it the way USPS does. In fact, non government entities were forced to via the Pens…

> If anything, all entities promising retirement benefits should be forced to do it the way USPS does That would be nice but [insert financing excuse here] others cant do it too. > Too bad it didn’t apply to governments, because if it did, then my kids and I wouldn’t be stuck paying for labor performed 30+ years ago because all the city and state governments decided they can just promise to pay people with future tax…

> That would be nice but [insert financing excuse here] others cant do it too.

I don’t know what this means.

>Yes but forcing just USPS to do it was an attack on USPS because it has to compete with private companies.

FedEx and UPS are subject to the same pension and retirement benefit funding requirements as USPS. It’s only government entities that aren’t regulated (because politicians like to be able to pay current employees with future taxpayer money and advertise they are keeping taxes low now so they get elected).

Not letting USPS set it’s prices is what might make it non competitive with UPS/Fedex.

Re: Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

#113
post #50
post #25

Among other reasons, this is in big part happening due to a large push toward mail-in voting come the next Presidential election. It seems that certain political entities think they will suffer at the poles due to the fact that it’ll be easier to vote. easier voting -> more votes -> undesirable outcomes

its really bizarre that we allow this while in other countries you get fines for not voting

There's actually only a small minority of countries where voting is a duty, not a right. Cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_voting. Still, it's interesting to think about how that would change the dynamics in the US. I think there is a lot to be said for making voting compulsory.

Re: Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Unfortunately, HN userbase frowns upon what they incorrectly perceive as politicization of topics, so a lot of people will resort to whitewashing in the manner you described in order to avoid getting their posts flag-killed by partisans (which is what will happen to this comment - just watch).

I flagged you for playing the victim. I wouldn't have if you omitted your parenthetical.

Re: Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

#115

This is problematic to voting in the same way closing polling sites is, framed as cost cutting or inefficiency reduction with the intention of reducing access to a subset of the population. This is just frustration, but the fact that we could pass a massive defense bill (again, I know), but are unable to fund basic services shows the integrity of our government. Moreover, it shows the culpability of most of the elect…

> Moreover, it shows the culpability of most of the elected officials, from both parties. It shows that after the labor movement was destroyed, the only material base for the Democratic Party was to go looking for money from the same people who give it to Republicans. Saying we don’t need a labor movement is equivalent to saying “we don’t need a political party that relies on support from workers.”

No. The Democrats need to be a political party that relies on support from regular people. Whether they are workers is beside the point.

Now, the unions were a good way of funneling support to the Democrats. (Which, by the way, was a bit unfair if you were a Republican and a union member, but that's not the point.) What's missing now for the Democrats isn't the workers, it's the mechanism for mobilizing bulk support.

Re: Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

#116
post #22
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not giving employees benefits does not necessarily lead to a better service

The USPS is uniquely shackled by a ridiculous requirement to prefund 75 years worth of pension and medical benefits, and is also barred from raising rates the help pay for it. There is no way any organization can operate that way.

Thank Susan Collins, Republican senator of Maine, for that one. She's up for re-election this year.

Re: Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If anything, all entities promising retirement benefits should be forced to do it the way USPS does That would be nice but [insert financing excuse here] others cant do it too. > Too bad it didn’t apply to governments, because if it did, then my kids and I wouldn’t be stuck paying for labor performed 30+ years ago because all the city and state governments decided they can just promise to pay people with future tax…

Banking from the post office is a pretty common thing and makes a lot of sense as it gives people a public, non-profit banking avenue for the poor and under served.

[deleted]

Re: Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

#118
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Republicans. It is Republicans who think more people voting means they will lose. Now is a time to be absolutely frank and direct with our words and our actions. Our democracy is not invincible. It is not inevitable. It is teetering on the brink and if it falls, there is absolutely no guarantee that it will recover. There is exactly one party who is trying to undermine the most basic principle of our democracy, and t…

Hate to break it to you, but it’s more complicated than that. You may want to do some reading from the other side, you sound like you’re parroting Democratic talking points. NYTimes disagrees with you that higher turnout always helps the Democrats. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/15/upshot/2020-election-turn... Typically increased turnout helps the Democrats, but that’s not necessarily true now.

You’re wrong.

Re: Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

#119
post #108
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He isn't saying it's okay .

He’s trying to justify that it is okay because it’s about privatization...months before a crucial election year. Doesn’t make sense. It’s gaslighting.

Are we reading the same comment?

Re: Mail delays hit Philadelphia residents, short staffed USPS struggles to keep up

#120
Table stakes for a civil society:

Clean water, fighting fires, drivable roads, edible food, reliable electricity, safety net for the poor elderly and infirm...

And delivering the mail.

And running the elections.

How did we get to this point in history where any of this is up for discussion?

Post reply on HN