The Facebook container is great, but I wish there was an option for the built-in Multi-Account containers to work this way. I've been doing what the Facebook Container extension does, but with built-in containers, and the experience is very clunky. The two biggest issues are that I can't give the container a list of domains beforehand and say "everything under google.com should open here". I have to go to each Google…
Do containers sync across devices yet? Having to re-establish all of my container rules on my work and personal computers is tedious
Firefox 74
111–120 of 269 posts
Re: Firefox 74
#112The largest change is disabling TLS 1.0 and 1.1 by default. Chrome following when 81 gets released (currently in beta).
An IETF Best Common Practice document saying to stop using TLS 1.0 (and TLS 1.1 which was rarely used in practice) will probably be published later this year. I liked this document's original name better but alas it's more important for people to act on correct advice than for the advice to make me smile.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moriarty-tls-oldversi...
Re: Firefox 74
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
> whenever I click a link on Gmail that goes to Github, Github opens in the Google container Google intercepts clicks and redirects them through a Google Domain to track clickthru. If you're in Gmail and hover over a link it will show the actual destination but onclick your browser opens a mail.google.com URL that redirects to the destination URL.
This extension removes the URL intercept/redirect on Gmail and many other sites: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/skip-redirect... This one handles the other situation, tracking parameters added to the URL that are intentionally passed to the target site: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/neat-url/
That redirect always bugged me.
EDIT: I just noticed on the install page "This is not a Recommended Extension. Make sure you trust it before installing.Learn more" which is annoying.
Re: Firefox 74
#114Even if Facebook is containerized, if you make a purchase on .com they might just tell Facebook (without the browser involved)
There's nothing Mozilla can do about that too.
Re: Firefox 74
#115Any way to get rid of this "Your browser is being managed by your organization" tomfoolery without nuking the relevant code in EnterprisePolicies.js[1] and rebuilding Firefox? [1]: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/compo...
Re: Firefox 74
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
> whenever I click a link on Gmail that goes to Github, Github opens in the Google container Google intercepts clicks and redirects them through a Google Domain to track clickthru. If you're in Gmail and hover over a link it will show the actual destination but onclick your browser opens a mail.google.com URL that redirects to the destination URL.
It doesn't matter though, the tracking domain would run in the container and github outside it.
Re: Firefox 74
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
> whenever I click a link on Gmail that goes to Github, Github opens in the Google container Google intercepts clicks and redirects them through a Google Domain to track clickthru. If you're in Gmail and hover over a link it will show the actual destination but onclick your browser opens a mail.google.com URL that redirects to the destination URL.
It doesn't matter though, the tracking domain would run in the container and github outside it.
In the former scenario you'd basically get 2 new tabs, in the later you'd have a tab represent two different containers based on where you navigate in history.
Either way it sounds unsavory.
Re: Firefox 74
#118Surely that depends on how hard the application wants to try? I suppose they might mean that installing add-ons externally is now unsupported.
Re: Firefox 74
#119Eagerly awaiting a Firefox release that improves power consumption on Mac to a point where it is at least close to competitive with Safari. That, plus the rumors that iOS will soon allow 3rd party default browsers and I'm all in Firefox for sure.
restricting all browsers to use safari is the single killer feature that made me stick with ios. If I blacklisted a website in control center it is respected in all browsers even in private mode.
"killer" is right, "feature" is not. It's very anti-competitive and for those who don't want to use Safari it means iOS is just not an option.
> If I blacklisted a website in control center it is respected in all browsers even in private mode.
This is useful if you're using multiple browsers, but why bother if they're all Safari?
Re: Firefox 74
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
It doesn't matter though, the tracking domain would run in the container and github outside it.
I don't want google to know that I clicked on the link. That is sensitive.