Live data from Hacker News

Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

theregister.co.uk

111–114 of 114 posts

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Domain names are not one time purchases? Secondly are you referring to monthly or yearly? They sometimes do flash deals which might be why you got it for one year at that price (assuming you paid that yearly). But the discounts usually don't last forever.

It was for one year. I just checked and it is set for auto renewal in November and will cost another $12 for another year. It is a 6 letter domain.

Button.dev? ;)

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#112
post #9

This whole situation is ridiculous. We need an alternative to all this centralized control, and we need it now.

> We need an alternative to all this centralized control, and we need it now. The Handshake Naming System [1] provides a decentralized option, works directly with the existing legacy system so there will be 0 difficulty in the transition, and it’s usable right now [2]! Just install hsd [3] and point your resolution to localhost to join the movement to an internet owned by the people. [1] https://handshake.org [2] htt…

Handshake might be good and all, but it still feels a little off that you keep advertising this without ever acknowledging your significant personal investment in it.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#113
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Redirects to a major retailer for pet and animal products.

Am I really getting old enough to where modern developers know nothing about the dot com crash? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pets.com

Ha, I know that. But my point is, you don't see petsmart.com 302'ing to pets.com. You see the opposite. Which furthers the point that .com's aren't that valuable. Since Pets.com didn't last all that long, it might not be fair to characterize it's short-term existence and high-market value as a sustaining, legitimate billion-dollar business.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#114
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, I will say this about the TLD "debacle", when I recently went looking for a domain name made out of real words, but not in what you'd call the "A list" (i.e., not "drugs.com" or "money.com"), they have at least made it ineffectual now for squatters to squat on everything across all the useful TLDs. Someone wanted a couple $K for the .com variant but there were several other useful variants completely unregister…

Does anyone actually use or go to services on super-generic TLDs like that? I can't think of any billion-dollar businesses that exist at .com. I can't imagine they're as valuable as people make them out to be, because businesses have brands that aren't generic words like "money" or "drugs". There's "amazon" but the business has nothing do with rainforests, so it's not like they're benefitting from traffic from people…

I work for the owners of vacation.com , but to be honest the owners have never managed to leverage the domain into a great funnel. They're a multibillion dollar business but not thanks to the domain name.
Post reply on HN