Live data from Hacker News

Starlink Is a Big Deal

sneak.berlin

111–120 of 365 posts

Re: Starlink Is a Big Deal

#111

I don’t understand how you can make functional satellites so small? That they can launch 60 at once. Usually a launch just has one satellite.

Engineers keep shrinking communications, computer, and power technology. Launch services keep coming down in cost.

Check out all the stuff people are accomplishing with CubeSats, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CubeSat

Re: Starlink Is a Big Deal

#112

Just going to plug my Starlink tracker here: https://james.darpinian.com/satellites/?special=starlink It tells you when to go outside and look up to see the satellites as they pass over your house. It's a cool sight to see because there are up to 60 of them crossing the sky at the same time in a line.

It tells you when to go outside and look up to see the satellites as they pass over your house This must be made up. I have been assured repeatedly on HN that Starlink is a visual non-factor, and that nobody would notice them in the sky, they won't get in the way of astronomy, stargazing, or just enjoying the night sky like humans have done for thousands of years.

Well, there's an easy way to find out who's right. Look at the website, go outside when it tells you to, and look up. Let us know what you find.

Re: Starlink Is a Big Deal

#113

Just going to plug my Starlink tracker here: https://james.darpinian.com/satellites/?special=starlink It tells you when to go outside and look up to see the satellites as they pass over your house. It's a cool sight to see because there are up to 60 of them crossing the sky at the same time in a line.

It tells you when to go outside and look up to see the satellites as they pass over your house This must be made up. I have been assured repeatedly on HN that Starlink is a visual non-factor, and that nobody would notice them in the sky, they won't get in the way of astronomy, stargazing, or just enjoying the night sky like humans have done for thousands of years.

Dusk

Re: Starlink Is a Big Deal

#114

Just going to plug my Starlink tracker here: https://james.darpinian.com/satellites/?special=starlink It tells you when to go outside and look up to see the satellites as they pass over your house. It's a cool sight to see because there are up to 60 of them crossing the sky at the same time in a line.

Oh that's great. Now I can better aim my Elon-Sattelite-fryer device.

I already collected 25 old microwave ovens which I plan to operate as phased array to produce a collimated beam of microwaves directed at the satellites to fry their electronics. I might have a better chance If know the exact frequency their receivers are tuned to. Does anybody know more?

The reckless littering of our precious LEO must end here!

Re: Starlink Is a Big Deal

#115

Just going to plug my Starlink tracker here: https://james.darpinian.com/satellites/?special=starlink It tells you when to go outside and look up to see the satellites as they pass over your house. It's a cool sight to see because there are up to 60 of them crossing the sky at the same time in a line.

Wow, this is pretty cool! Looks like a bunch should be visible on Saturday from LA. I’ll definitely be keeping a lookout!

Re: Starlink Is a Big Deal

#116

I'm not convinced that Starlink will provide access to the "half of the human beings (who) are not online yet." Of course that would be good, yet my guess is that Starlink will target people in developed nations who are in rural areas, or people who want low latency. Maybe Starlink could serve people w/o internet if a whole village buys a subscription, or if a cell provider uses Starlink as backhaul for voice? Still…

Unless you mean a village with just two houses, typical villages are covered by cellular networks just fine. Starlink looks like a system for people in deserts or people in third world where LTE doesn't exist. Not sure if this is big enough market.

LTE is not satisfactory for home internet in the US. See https://www.verizonwireless.com/internet-devices/verizon-jet...

Re: Starlink Is a Big Deal

#117
To me the article misses the bigger deal: SpaceX launched 60 satellites in a single launch & ~250 in ~8 months! Under 9000 satellites have ever been launched in 756 months, since 1957. That’s a launch rate increase from 12/month to over 31/month.

Re: Starlink Is a Big Deal

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Starlink will suffer from congestion just like a cellular network. It's even worse than a cellular network. With a cell network, one can just build more towers in a particular city. With LEO satellites, the only way to get more coverage over a particular city is to get more coverage over the entire world.

Maybe you could roam on another LEO provider. There are over a dozen companies from a number of countries planning their own Starlinks. Half a million satellites ought to be enough for anybody.

> Maybe you could roam on another LEO provider. There are over a dozen companies from a number of countries planning their own Starlinks.

I mean, they're planning their own internet satellite constellations. None of them are anywhere close to the 12k satellites in the original Starlink proposal. If you added everyone else's proposals together, you might make 1 more Starlink, but probably not.

Re: Starlink Is a Big Deal

#119
Honestly, I’m just excited for the more mundane future of having an alternative to Comcast/Spectrum and the corresponding drop in prices that will hopefully come along with it.

Re: Starlink Is a Big Deal

#120

> "Hundreds of cities and dozens of countries, fine for living but previously entirely unsuitable for a place of business, will blink from red to green on the map once Starlink goes live." this reads like a marketing piece rather than actual analysis. Throughput of a single satellite is 20Gbps. The finished constellation if I recall correctly is supposed to be about 12k satellites. So about ~250.000Gbps. So assuming…

That is correct, as someone looking for a remote job opportunity, 95+% of the "remote" job posts are still restringed to residents of specific countries/zones. Having good connectivity or being in the same time-zone matter very little.

I solved this by incorporating a company (b2b consulting) and spending time periodically in the cities my clients live/work in. Work onsite for a couple weeks, then go home and finish the project.

If you’re remote, they shouldn’t care where you are. It’s just a sales issue, then, and can be overcome like any other sales objection.

Post reply on HN