Live data from Hacker News

Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

wsj.com

111–120 of 219 posts

Re: Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They beat them to online documents, spreadsheets, storage by years. Google Docs launched after they bought Write.ly in 2006. Lots of teams don't even use Office anymore and use online office like Google. Yes lots of places still use Office but there is no denying Google beat them online and it was Microsofts share to lose. Being first is just a nerd victory like saying Apple was the first desktop operating system wit…

> Being first is just a nerd victory like saying Apple was the first desktop operating system with a GUI. “Winning” in a for profit business is profit. Before Google Docs / G+ suite there was really only Office. Now everything is Google vs Office 365. Most small/medium even startups use Google Docs as it is good enough. Yes like I said, entrenched Microsoft companies use Office and Office 365 is finally good and is w…

* Before Google Docs / G+ suite there was really only Office. Now everything is Google vs Office 365. Most small/medium even startups use Google Docs as it is good enough.*

GSuite is losing market share.

http://www.cloudcomputing-news.net/news/2018/may/30/office-3...

And if DropBox is “winning” and losing money, isn’t that a Pyrrhic victory?

You can simply not deny that Google Drive was first and is mostly winning the storage battle.

Being first is again, a nerd point. Where is the money?

Re: Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

#112

It has always seemed strange to me that Google become part of Alphabet, instead of vice-versa. It seems like a much more honest approach would always have been for Google to be one company... for Alphabet to be a separate one... and for, say, Google to own 33% of Alphabet, for Larry and Sergei personally to own another 33%, and outside investors to own the rest and be the ones principally determining its own, separat…

Given that Alphabet was basically Larry and Seigei's personal pet projects and the goal was for Google to fund these projects, it's easier to funnel money up instead of out.

Wasn't YouTube a separate entity under Alphabet, and not a part of Google? That alone would be a $100B company

Re: Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

#113
post #10

>Placing the head of Google, which contributes more than 99% of Alphabet’s sales, at the helm of it could call into question the entire purpose of Alphabet I think this gives a false impression of the value of the non Google bits of Alphabet Currently the market cap of Alphabet is $924bn and "Waymo is worth about $105 billion" ( https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-27/waymo-val... ) which would make that 1…

This isn't an insightful comment, but I just said out loud "what's Waymo again?" after having seen the name here and there for the past decade. Kinda feels dead on arrival.

Re: Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

#114

The fact that you linked to an amp version of the page, instead of the real link, is deeply disturbing to me. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-12-04/alphab...

Google makes it a pain in the ass to get to the non-AMP version. You have to click the little (i) and then the link.

Re: Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

#115
post #109
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In this case, AMP doesn't help much...it's still downloading a ton of crap. 464 requests and 12MB of garbage for an AMP hosted article. https://imgur.com/tPHaHIO

That's because you are running in a simulator and not doing ad-blocking. Here is the real deal, 1.9MB and took 12 seconds to load completely: https://imgur.com/a/XcsNEsp The actual Bloomberg page was 5.3Mbytes and took 30 seconds to load completely: https://imgur.com/a/zBaOzeD If 3X improvement in loading time and data transfer is not much of a help, I don't know what it is. USERS like AMP because it is an actual imp…

12 seconds and 1.9MB isn't anything to brag about either, especially considering you needed an ad-blocker to get there.

Re: Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

#116
post #4

If you're having trouble reading it: https://outline.com/pGLZ6U

I dont know how what you did is legal.

From https://www.outline.com/dmca.html

Notice to Users If someone else might own the copyright to it, don't submit it. Outline is for reading pages that:

you own the rights to, is in the public domain, constitutes fair use, or you have consent of the copyright holder.

If we find you repeatedly submitting content that does not meet the above criteria, we will block you from using our service.

Re: Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

#117
post #5

As usual, I like Matt Levine's take. [1] Page and Brin ran Alphabet as a highly funded system of moonshot programs with near-infinite runway to make profits, which is unusual or unique. Basically it only worked that way because Page and Brin were idealistic visionary gazillionaires who were bored of thinking about the somewhat dirty business of selling targetted ads. With a more standard corporate governance under a…

Non-AMP page:[1]

Alphabet's problem is simply that they mostly failed. Robots - fail. ISPs (Fiber, Loon) - fail. Self-driving cars - in test, but a long way from profits. Android predates Alphabet and is really part of the ad system.

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-12-04/alphab...

Re: Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

#118
post #113
post #10

>Placing the head of Google, which contributes more than 99% of Alphabet’s sales, at the helm of it could call into question the entire purpose of Alphabet I think this gives a false impression of the value of the non Google bits of Alphabet Currently the market cap of Alphabet is $924bn and "Waymo is worth about $105 billion" ( https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-27/waymo-val... ) which would make that 1…

This isn't an insightful comment, but I just said out loud "what's Waymo again?" after having seen the name here and there for the past decade. Kinda feels dead on arrival.

Just because you didn't like the name ? They have the least disengagements and more miles than anyone (with a LIDAR).

Re: Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

#119
post #4

If you're having trouble reading it: https://outline.com/pGLZ6U

I dont know how what you did is legal. From https://www.outline.com/dmca.html Notice to Users If someone else might own the copyright to it, don't submit it. Outline is for reading pages that: you own the rights to, is in the public domain, constitutes fair use, or you have consent of the copyright holder. If we find you repeatedly submitting content that does not meet the above criteria, we will block you from using…

[deleted]

Re: Google management shuffle points to retreat from Alphabet experiment

#120
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A forced redesign, in this case motivated by AMP, is what gave you that better mobile experience. It is not something inherent to AMP, and in other ways AMP is incredibly harmful. Most mobile browsers now have "reading mode" anyway.

The selling point of AMP is that it's a mobile-friendly web component framework. If someone uses AMP for their website, and as a result you get a better mobile experience, it's hard to see how that's not inherent to AMP.

I turn on the faucet and fill a glass of water. Taking a drink from the glass, I feel less thirsty. If someone turns on a faucet, and as a result feels less thirsty, then that that thirst-removal must be inherent to turning on a faucet, right?

This is obviously silly, but follows the same reasoning that you have stated. Drinking water reduces thirst, not running water from a faucet. Redesigning a website to be less bloated results in a better mobile experience, not designing around AMP. It is possible to redesign a website without using AMP.

Causation does not imply necessity.

Post reply on HN