This is the consequence of monopolies. Before YouTube gobbled up the world there were great, niche video sites ran by fans of the coolest things. They are mostly gone now. It is sad. The web really used to be an adventure. I miss that part of the internet. You felt like you found these secret underground worlds where people were really into something. Now it’s different. Maybe what we have now it what is needed for c…
> Before YouTube gobbled up the world there were great, niche video sites ran by fans of the coolest things True Honest Question. What were these sights? I was a teenage in the 1990s. I seriously and literally do not know and now I want to.
US "broadband" (apparently: any connection speed >56.6kbps, mostly early T1 lines at 1.5 Mbps) crossed the 50% threshold in October, 2004.
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/bw/0506/
Video quality and bitrates are tightly related. 240p video (320x240) requires 300-700 kbps for live streaming, well beyond the capabilities of modems. 360p is in the 700kbps - 1.5 Mbps range, now considered low-end DSL. 720p, a reasonable HD resolution (1280×720) runs at 2-4Mbps, and 4K is 15-25Mbps.
https://teradek.com/blogs/articles/what-is-the-optimal-bitra...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/2017/12/10/you...
My own recollections are that live streaming video wasn't a commonly-encountered thing until the mid-2000s, that Netflix was still mailing (rather than streaming) video as of 2007, and adoption of that service took considerable time.
https://qz.com/887010/netflix-nflx-launched-streaming-video-...
As of the late 1990s, online audio was a relative rarity, and much of that RealAudio based, witness early archives of programming from NPR and other sources locked in inaccessible, and very low-quality, audio codecs.
Assertions of a pre-2004, let alone pre-1999, golden age of Internet Video are implausible.