Live data from Hacker News

Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

decrypt.co

111–120 of 133 posts

Re: Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tether has not worked for years, they say on their website they're not redeemable for dollars ever. Yes, I suppose by that metric chuck-e-cheese tokens work too, but you'd have the same luck trying to get your cash back out of either. It's "worked" on a hope and a prayer because crypto-to-crypto exchanges who can't achieve AML/KYC compliance rely on it. How else are the narcos and the sanctioned supposed to launder t…

> How else are the narcos and the sanctioned supposed to launder their proceeds? HSBC seems like a fine choice no?

Please update your references, HSBC was ages ago

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/sep/21/is-money-la...

The real narcos and kleptocrats don't bother with Bitcoin, that's for small fry.

Re: Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

#112

I know there are a lot of crypto skeptics here, but if you believe in Bitcoin more than Tether at least then you should buy Bitcoin...if Tether does indeed fail Bitcoin will almost certainly spike past 2017 highs.

This assumes the price of bitcoin is not manipulated, specifically by bitfinex and tether. Both may go down together when more news of manipulation comes out. At this point, I wouldn't recommend going near any of the current cryptocurrencies, for any use.

What about other coins tied directly to fiat?

Re: Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

#113
post #99
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reason is when you have some other crypto holding and you want to close out your position but not have any reportable tax or legal liability. Of course you’re trading one set of liabilities and legal ramifications for a whole new set. Plus a hell of a lot of counter party risk.

Receiving the proceeds of the sale of one crypto currency in another crypto currency doesn't magically wipe out your tax liability. Your capital gains are still taxable, just as they would be if you bartered stocks without first selling your holdings.

Oh for sure. I didn't mean to imply it was a good idea. For anybody in the USA this is not going to be a legal winner as any transformation from crypto A to crypto B is going to be a taxable event.

I bet there's still plenty of people using this for tax purposes, either misguidingly for tax avoidance or explicitly for tax evasion.

Re: Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

#114
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no chance it is 100% backed like they claim. I would happily wager $10000 on it if a framework for such a wager existed.

You could open up a prediction market on Augur.

Interesting! Can Augur manage USD via escrow?

Re: Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The main issue is what will happen when holders of USDT try to redeem them. Tether says it's immune to a bank run, because they have the entire outstanding amount of USDT (3.83B at time of writing) is backed 74% with USD. If you believe that a company without access to banking actually has 2.8B USD available for disbursement, then you are more optimistic than I am.

I'm just saying that tether has worked for years, and the peg seems to be still there. All those years also people have been saying that tether will lose its liquidity any moment. Might be but tha market data says what it says. As I said I haven't used tether and highly probably will never use it - I don't have any use case, bitcoin is enough for me. However if I had some use-case for moderate amount and months of ti…

  I'm just saying that tether has
  worked for years, and the peg
  seems to be still there.
A parachute that has "seemed to be there for years" is all very well - but evidence it's fine when no-one pulls the ripcord doesn't tell us what'll happen when someone does.

And if it's a parachute, what happens when someone pulls the ripcord is kinda the most important thing :)

Re: Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

May I point you to @bitfinexed for all the proof you can handle? https://medium.com/@bitfinexed

Oh yes a short seller writing articles on medium must have the unbiased truth we're looking for. The US authorities should have saved time by just contacting him instead of doing an investigation

It’s important to take any information someone presents you that doesn’t line up with your existing worldview and just find a way to ignore it, that’s why were all here right?

Re: Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The majority of markets don't care if it is 100% backed, like they don't care when their bank does fractional reserve. They care about whether the USD peg will last within their timespan they plan to use tether. One of the most common advertised applications for tether is arbitrage between exchanges. There it hardly matters whether tether has 100% reserves, what matters if the peg stays within the days that you are d…

> The majority of markets don't care if it is 100% backed, like they don't care when their bank does fractional reserve Fractional reserve banks' deposits are backed more than 100% with more or less liquid assets. That's why nobody cares if a bank does fractional reserve. With tether there is no reason to believe there is even close to 100% backing. Unless you count as a reason an unverified claim that they are backe…

> with more or less liquid assets

What's more liquid than cash itself?

I also have an hard time it's backed with MORE value and whether that value is fictional or not. The 2008 crash has shown that it wasn't actually backed by much.

Re: Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

#118
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The majority of markets don't care if it is 100% backed, like they don't care when their bank does fractional reserve Fractional reserve banks' deposits are backed more than 100% with more or less liquid assets. That's why nobody cares if a bank does fractional reserve. With tether there is no reason to believe there is even close to 100% backing. Unless you count as a reason an unverified claim that they are backe…

> with more or less liquid assets What's more liquid than cash itself? I also have an hard time it's backed with MORE value and whether that value is fictional or not. The 2008 crash has shown that it wasn't actually backed by much.

"Or less"

Any bank with assets worth less than liabilities is bankrupt. You may not believe it, but regulators that allow bank to operate and any one holding bank equity with stock price above zero believes that bank's assets are worth more than liabilities.

There you are right that it is possible that tje value of the bank's assets may decline fast, but normally the assets exceed deposits quite significantly as deposits are amongst the highest priorities, so other liabilities (senior debt and equity) act as buffers as well.

Re: Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

#119
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> with more or less liquid assets What's more liquid than cash itself? I also have an hard time it's backed with MORE value and whether that value is fictional or not. The 2008 crash has shown that it wasn't actually backed by much.

"Or less" Any bank with assets worth less than liabilities is bankrupt. You may not believe it, but regulators that allow bank to operate and any one holding bank equity with stock price above zero believes that bank's assets are worth more than liabilities. There you are right that it is possible that tje value of the bank's assets may decline fast, but normally the assets exceed deposits quite significantly as depo…

Of course, when I say liabilities, I mean non-equity.

Re: Tether loaned USDT to investors and illegally traded in New York, says NYAG

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would bitcoin spike?

Since it's very difficult to convert USDT into real USD, if people were desperately trying to exit their Tether positions, they'd likely do it by changing for other cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.

I think that would be a spike in Bitcoin relative to Tether, not relative to the dollar. In the extreme, people might want to exchange any amount of Tether for the tiniest piece of a Bitcoin, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the Bitcoin/dollar rate changes.
Post reply on HN