ICANN is a mafia. Not sure why it exists in its ugly form today. I'd rather transfer these rights to Mozilla.
ICANN lifts the price cap on .org domains
111–115 of 115 posts
Re: ICANN lifts the price cap on .org domains
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I mean if a name is available to use, you can just use it. There's no negotiation, no price barrier, nothing. How is that different in domain names? If the name is available, you buy it and use it. And the "price barrier" for domain names was less than filing incorporation paperwork, in my state anyway. >I think most of my frustration is toward the domain squatting/reselling industry. At least with domain names you…
> How is that different in domain names? If the name is available, you buy it and use it. Because in the absence of price caps the registrar can choose to increase the price on "valuable" domain names (for whatever arbitrary criteria it decides means a domain is "valuable").
He wasn't speaking about .org domains specifically:
>The whole domain market experience is utter crap. Commoditizing domain names has created such an unbalanced power dynamic between buyers and sellers where the sellers hold all the power. Gatekeeping at it's finest.
He's speaking in the present/past tense, so obviously he can't be referring to what may happen in the future with .org domain names.
So I'm comparing incorporating a business purchasing a domain name, today.
Re: ICANN lifts the price cap on .org domains
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
All .org and .info domains will be priced the same. Not more valuable ones can be at a higher cost.
Not anymore, that's exactly what the article is about. > ICANN has agreed to remove price restrictions on .org domain names, letting the domain’s manager, Public Interest Registry, charge as much as it wants for the domains. (It also agreed to let .info manager Afilias charge whatever it wants for .info.)
You are wrong. All .org domains will be priced the same as will .info domains. They can't decide a particular .org domain is worth more than another (that has already been registered and is being used). They can charge what they want but they can't differentiate between domains. And the quote you gave essentially says that.
This is different than a completely new tld whereby they might decide that a name is premium. The point is no legacy domain will be priced as premium. I guess in theory if it expires they might be able to do that but the 'can charge what they want' will not impact existing domain registrations. And in the case of a valuable domain if that were released it would be grabbed at auction and not available for the simple registration fee.
Re: ICANN lifts the price cap on .org domains
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not anymore, that's exactly what the article is about. > ICANN has agreed to remove price restrictions on .org domain names, letting the domain’s manager, Public Interest Registry, charge as much as it wants for the domains. (It also agreed to let .info manager Afilias charge whatever it wants for .info.)
You are wrong. All .org domains will be priced the same as will .info domains. They can't decide a particular .org domain is worth more than another (that has already been registered and is being used). They can charge what they want but they can't differentiate between domains. And the quote you gave essentially says that. This is different than a completely new tld whereby they might decide that a name is premium.…
We're not talking about renewing already-registered domains.
Re: ICANN lifts the price cap on .org domains
#115The whole decentralize everything! movement seems to overlook DNS. I get that technically the DNS system is decentralized, but in reality, you lease a domain from a random, usually politically charged entity, who can do anything with it, if they wish. We need a real DNS system, one where an individual can request and have a domain for life and which is truly decentralized. Unfortunately none of the attempts - .onion…
Another project to keep an eye on is OpenAlias
https://openalias.org/