Live data from Hacker News

Freeing My Phone from Google

hexaquo.at

111–120 of 144 posts

Re: Freeing My Phone from Google

#111
post #55

Any suggestions for Google Keep replacement? I really hate that all reminders end up in Google Calendar. I've already tried almost all Tasks apps from F-Droid, but each has some or other annoyance that prevents me from using it.

Zoho notebook might fit your bill - its basically a keep clone

Re: Freeing My Phone from Google

#113
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not though, according to the terms of service

What ToS has NewPipe been violating? I've read the ToS[0] and it seems that NewPipe is perfectly complaint. It accesses YouTube via "the video playback pages of the Website" so it satisfies 5.1 article C. I don't see any limitation to using browsers there. Indeed, article H strongly implies that it is allowed to use non-browser software to access these pages - otherwise spiders and robots would be banned and there wo…

I believe the most relevant section is 4.F.

> If you use the Embeddable Player on your website, you may not modify, build upon, or block any portion or functionality of the Embeddable Player, including but not limited to links back to the YouTube website.

Re: Freeing My Phone from Google

#114

I find it sad that there is no recommendation for microg in this article, since some apps refuse to work without the Google APIs. I'd also add Aurora Store as an alternative Playstore apps downloader. You can even log in with an anonymous account, so Google can't link app downloads to your personal account.

Absolutely, microG is a great project, especially when you need to use proprietary apps which rely on Google APIs. However, with the goal of also generally moving towards free software on my smartphone, I personally only needed the UnifiedNlp part (which is mentioned in the Map section) - in my experience, most free apps don't depend on other Google services.

Re: Freeing My Phone from Google

#115
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What ToS has NewPipe been violating? I've read the ToS[0] and it seems that NewPipe is perfectly complaint. It accesses YouTube via "the video playback pages of the Website" so it satisfies 5.1 article C. I don't see any limitation to using browsers there. Indeed, article H strongly implies that it is allowed to use non-browser software to access these pages - otherwise spiders and robots would be banned and there wo…

I believe the most relevant section is 4.F. > If you use the Embeddable Player on your website, you may not modify, build upon, or block any portion or functionality of the Embeddable Player, including but not limited to links back to the YouTube website.

5.1. Article G? NewPipe isn't a website, so this shouldn't apply.

Re: Freeing My Phone from Google

#116
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google Maps is fully compatible with MicroG, a free and open source replacement for the Google Play Services client. MicroG includes UnifiedNlp, which was discussed in the blog post. https://microg.org/ https://lineage.microg.org/ At the moment, I recommend the previous version of MicroG (0.2.6.13280) since the latest version (0.2.7.17455) may have compatibility issues. If you're using LineageOS for MicroG, builds on…

MicroG talks to Google servers and uses Google's infrastructure while breaking the terms of service (at least in case of FCM). Same goes with NewPipe - you're using YouTube without actually paying for bandwidth, storage costs or the video author. So you're not actually getting yourself rid of Google or tracking, you're just using their resources without paying the asking price. Use other alternatives instead.

> So you're not actually getting yourself rid of Google or tracking, you're just using their resources without paying the asking price.

Google's asking price includes performing invasive surveillance. So when dodging Google's surveillance, it is impossible to access any content hosted at Google while living up to your standard. Which makes your argument a bit dishonest.

Now sure, there is a straightforward argument that the best way to push back against Google is to completely avoid content hosted there, which discourages others from hosting there in the first place. But you did not make this argument, I suspect because it's overly optimistic in an environment of heavy network effects.

Re: Freeing My Phone from Google

#118
Gday I would recommend all people shift to free speech platforms

    Facebook >> Minds + Mewe + pocketnet.app

    Twitter >> Gab + Parler

    Youtube >> Bitchute + invidio.us

    Twitch >> joshwhotv

    Pateron >> subscribestar

    Instagram >> Pixelfed

    Meetup >> @GetTogether

    Skype >> Wire or Jami/GNU Ring

    Firefox >> Waterfox browser

    Chrome >> Iridium browser

    Brave >> Gab Dissenter Browser

    MS Office >> Libreoffice suite

    Windows >> Linux

    Android >> LinageOS & F Droid Store
    (Waterfox browser is available for Android phones)

    Google Search >> Duckduckgo

    Google Mail >> Proton mail or Tutanota mail

    Google Maps >> OpenStreetMap



Regards Charliebrownau

Re: Freeing My Phone from Google

#119
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you have a recommendation for a phone that has a <=5" screen that is supported by LineageOS and MicroG? It seems like most of the well supported phones are too big to comfortably fit in my pocket.

I personally recommend the first-generation Google Pixel XL (marlin), which costs under $100 used on eBay. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel_(smartphone) With MicroG, Google Camera works as it does on stock Android. Most phones on LineageOS aren't able to use their stock camera app, which results in reduced camera quality compared to stock Android. The Pixel/Nexus line, ironically, is the main exception. Google Cam…

Can you elaborate on this? Is it the app itself needing to do some type of processing for peak performance, or some firmware blob that the app bundles and loads?

Pictures on my S7 herolte (microG+LOS obviously) are grainy, and investigating why is quite far down on my todo list. This wasn't a problem on i9500, klte, or shamu. I had thought the issue must be some missing firmware, either from the OS image or it got wiped somehow. Compounded by being in Exynos rather than more popular Qualcomm land. But not knowing all that much about the Android photo stack, it's interesting to hear you say it depends on the app used itself.

Re: Freeing My Phone from Google

#120
post #16

I really dislike people recommending Signal in a post about free software since Signal has a pretty bad track record when it comes to allowing non official clients to connect to its network. So much for user freedom.

You're conflating free software with free as in "I shouldn't have to pay for anything", in a way. The Signal client is FOSS, but the folks who develop signal are in no way obligated to provide resources for people to use it if they do not want. I'm not aware of any FOSS license which says "we have to allow anyone to use our resources to run forks of our software"
Post reply on HN