Earlier quoted context omitted.
Framing this as “the users” is disingenuous, again, a lot of users favored the decision too. The arguments of those users were taken into account, but the decision was made against it anwyay. Those polls were incredibly non-scientific, and don’t really mean anything.
And you had better polling besides just your cohort and what other said to you? This seems like a disingenuous argument, ending with you can't really trust anything but our own opinions. Yes, they were bad, self-selecting polls. You have nothing better, and I hear far more complains than people being happy with the decision. The polls both tended to agree though so that would lend some credibility. Maybe you should h…
The teams always make decisions. That’s why they exist.