Live data from Hacker News

Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville

gizmodo.com

111–120 of 190 posts

Re: Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville

#111
How bad were their roads prior to Google? If it's like a lot of other states, roads get little funding for improvements

Louisville should have looked at the model set by Chattanooga's EPB. Fastest internet in the country and a highly rated customer service team. Their roads suck too but it's not the ISP's fault.

Re: Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville

#112
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They tried to lay fiber in 2in trenches instead of typical 6in trenches. Then left when it didn't work. This isn't Goliath beating David. This is David throwing a rock, missing, and going home.

I’m not sure David and Goliath is an apt metaphor when Google has a market cap 4x that of a broadband competitor Comcast.

David vs Satan is more apt

Re: Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville

#113

Let’s not forget that the real issue here is that American ISPs are a complete monopoly by Comcast and AT&T, companies made of pure greed. Small end sub ISPs have to claw for every strand of dark fiber. Google really shouldn’t be the answer though. We need to demand that politicians address the issue in the upcoming election before they start looking at the Silicon Valley giants.

> Let’s not forget that the real issue here is that American ISPs are a complete monopoly by Comcast and AT&T

It doesn't change much, but you left out Verizon and Spectrum.

Re: Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville

#115

Let’s not forget that the real issue here is that American ISPs are a complete monopoly by Comcast and AT&T, companies made of pure greed. Small end sub ISPs have to claw for every strand of dark fiber. Google really shouldn’t be the answer though. We need to demand that politicians address the issue in the upcoming election before they start looking at the Silicon Valley giants.

[deleted]

Re: Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville

#117

Let’s not forget that the real issue here is that American ISPs are a complete monopoly by Comcast and AT&T, companies made of pure greed. Small end sub ISPs have to claw for every strand of dark fiber. Google really shouldn’t be the answer though. We need to demand that politicians address the issue in the upcoming election before they start looking at the Silicon Valley giants.

> Let’s not forget that the real issue here is that American ISPs are a complete monopoly by Comcast and AT&T It doesn't change much, but you left out Verizon and Spectrum.

True, but in any given market you'll be lucky to have even two of the above as competitors, let alone 3 or more.

Re: Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know "fiber to the neighborhood and coax to the home" is how both Comcast and WOW operate. Note that coax can provide some fairly decent performance, with DOCSIS 3.1, you can do gigabit down a coax cable, though the networks are still built asymmetrically, so you're only going to see 50 Mbps back up on a connection like that.

Agreed. DOCSIS 3.1 is nice. I think most of the bad news around coax is because a lot of cable operators overload their nodes.

Indeed, and the lack of upload is a design choice, not a physical limitation of the medium, as far as I know. Coax is fairly durable, is less challenging to install and much easier to repair, and as long as they can push the speed over it, I really see no reason to run fiber into the home.

Re: Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It did have a positive impact though because AT&T and Verizon started actually building out their fiber networks more aggressively when they saw google entering the space. I live in Orange County, CA and AT&T out here started building out fiber when they saw Google building in Irvine, CA. AT&T knows that if they could just "rope off" google to a small area then their initial investment wouldn't really be worth it.

My concern is whether the ISPs will find expanding and maintaining their fiber infrastructure necessary if Google continues to pull out of the market, or whether it'll end up crushed like the EV-1 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_EV1 ). Is there enough demand already generated in industries requiring significant network throughput (e.g. e-sports, industrial IoT, or elsewhere) that ISPs will shoot themse…

> My concern is whether the ISPs will find expanding and maintaining their fiber infrastructure necessary if Google continues to pull out of the market.

I can answer that: they won't. ISPs showed they have the capacity to expand and improve and bring better service to people when they're challenged to do so, but it is equally obvious that they give not two fucks about anywhere they have no competition, which is basically everywhere.

The Google of the past that did cool stuff was our one ticket to disrupting this bullshit and getting it fixed, and Google the corporate big business machine of today killed that hope.

And if you think it'll get better as other parts of the world continue to pass us by, all you have to do is look at our health care system to see how that works out.

Re: Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville

#120
post #6

The failure of Google Fiber paints a very bleak picture of the future of internet infrastructure, or even all communication in this country. If Google cannot compete with the status quo, who can?

That's not the lesson I'd learn here. This seems like Google has not yet learned how civil engineering works, which is a crucial component in internet infrastructure. It's unfortunate that Louisville is getting bit hard here.

The lesson is never trust in the longevity of Google products, a lesson they keep teaching us over and over.
Post reply on HN