I wonder, if Gates was still driving Windows development would Windows 10 still spy on users and restrict their ability to control updates like it does with Nadella at the helm?
AMA: Bill Gates
111–120 of 178 posts
Re: AMA: Bill Gates
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
I skimmed the AMA for a few minutes, and saw him say that: - He thought nuclear weapons, bioterrorism, and climate change were the biggest threats to humanity. - He thought paying $10B in capital gains taxes was not enough and he should have paid more. Maybe those are platitudes but it's real enough for me.
in other words, war is dangerous and he pays too little tax. i think too they are platitudes.
Re: AMA: Bill Gates
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
That seems like a straw man to me - they’re saying the tax should be higher for people in their class generally, not that they individually wish to pay more.
Then they should say what they mean instead of being, as I mentioned, all passive aggressive about it.
I interpret "I should have paid more" as I should be compelled to pay more, not "I wish I could pay more". The distinction being they'd rather not pay additional tax, but they probably should have to. I think the language is just somewhat ambiguous (specifically the word 'should').
Re: AMA: Bill Gates
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
And yet... how many other billionaires do you see going out and saying that the capital gains tax rate is too low and climate change is the biggest threat to humanity.
A lot? I know Warren Buffett has similar views, and I've seen other very wealthy liberals claim taxes and climate change were big concerns. When people get very wealthy, they seem to think less about their finances and more about their legacy and public perception, and honestly when you're that wealthy, you have so much that taxes don't really matter anymore. There are a lot of very wealthy philanthropists, and I thi…
Re: AMA: Bill Gates
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
Automatic updates are a good thing, otherwise far too many machines would be lagging behind on security fixes.
Can we stop this tired rhetoric? Yes ideally everyone would keep their system up to date 100% of the time, however it is not a good thing that users have that control stripped away from them, especially when these updates can actually have _adverse_ effects on their systems cough randomly deleting files cough . I may disapprove of users not updating their systems, but I'll defend to the death their right to not do so…
We cannot rely on people to keep their systems updated, and this behavior costs society billions of dollars annually. Because of this people need to either accept automated patching, or stay off of the public internet.
This is an entrenched aspect of our society: you're free to do what you want, until your behavior causes negative ramifications to the rest of us, at which point, we as a society reserve the right to regulate poor behavior.
Re: AMA: Bill Gates
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Automatic updates are a good thing, otherwise far too many machines would be lagging behind on security fixes.
Can we stop this tired rhetoric? Yes ideally everyone would keep their system up to date 100% of the time, however it is not a good thing that users have that control stripped away from them, especially when these updates can actually have _adverse_ effects on their systems cough randomly deleting files cough . I may disapprove of users not updating their systems, but I'll defend to the death their right to not do so…
For the millions of others people who don't know how to find facebook without putting it into google search... yeah the automatic updates are good for them, and I'm tired of power users thinking their opinions are the only ones that matter.
Re: AMA: Bill Gates
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
Automatic updates are a good thing, otherwise far too many machines would be lagging behind on security fixes.
Can we stop this tired rhetoric? Yes ideally everyone would keep their system up to date 100% of the time, however it is not a good thing that users have that control stripped away from them, especially when these updates can actually have _adverse_ effects on their systems cough randomly deleting files cough . I may disapprove of users not updating their systems, but I'll defend to the death their right to not do so…
Re: AMA: Bill Gates
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here is a link to a Google calendar created by the IAmA team. Not sure how often it's updated, I assume as they get arranged https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=amaverify@gma...
IAmA mod here - we have a bot that updates it every time a guest schedules a new AMA, so it should always be up to date. We also manually add events in as they come from other sources. Bill likes to do his AmA's as "surprises", though, so we don't usually schedule those!
Re: AMA: Bill Gates
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
I skimmed the AMA for a few minutes, and saw him say that: - He thought nuclear weapons, bioterrorism, and climate change were the biggest threats to humanity. - He thought paying $10B in capital gains taxes was not enough and he should have paid more. Maybe those are platitudes but it's real enough for me.
He was asked how much he should pay though. He didn't give an actual answer and only said he didn't pay enough. Surely, he has an idea of an actual rate, but doesn't want to disclose it for whatever reason.
From the exact same answer.
Re: AMA: Bill Gates
#120I wonder, if Gates was still driving Windows development would Windows 10 still spy on users and restrict their ability to control updates like it does with Nadella at the helm?
Automatic updates are a good thing, otherwise far too many machines would be lagging behind on security fixes.