Google partnering with Ubisoft is promising here, but the question will be whether they could get the likes of Activision, EA, Square Enix, Capcom, Konami, Take Two, etc to work with this service as well. If they can't, they'll end up with the streaming equivalent of Origin or what not, while whoever does get everyone on board will take the market.
Google gets into game streaming with Project Stream
111–117 of 117 posts
Re: Google gets into game streaming with Project Stream
#112Really feel sad about recent prevailing sentiment across HN. Some comments seem to suggest Google needs to provide the following for this kind of "tech test": * Available for all browsers and comply all web standards. * Available for all languages across all regions, with accessibility features. * Promise not to "launch and shutdown in a few years". * Imply a real future product. But I'm guessing what Google wants to…
This seems to be a test that may turn into a future cloud product? Google has a lot of Pops which provide great latency for users, If they start filling these pops with gpus so that companies like ubisoft or epic or $gamecompany can pay for the infrastructure and let users pay them a subscription and then I don't have to drop 500+ dollars every year to stay relevant with AAA titles, maybe it all works out?
And the browser-based approach seems like a great solution for the platform issue. Being a Mac user I often miss out on steam games since they are mostly focused on Windows releases.
Re: Google gets into game streaming with Project Stream
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Clearly you are not happy with the announcement. :-)
Rather I'm not happy with the foreboding. I really like video games, and they keep getting worse... not the games themselves, but everything around them (due to "business" concerns), such as my above concerns, and IAP/DLC, and Xbox Live/PSN/Nintendo all charging money to play games on your already-paid-by-you internet connection, where it used to be free (since you can act as a server). For DLC, in some cases, it's n…
To play Devil's advocate, I would love to see real data on how much these older games get played.
The idea is that we buy a game and will continue to play it off and on for YEARS. But is that reality? Or do we finish a game or get tired of a game and then move on to a newer title and never return to those older games we thought we'd continue playing in the future?
I have MANY PS3/PS4 games I thought I would pick up again eventually. My PS3 has now been donated to goodwill after years of being disconnected and gathering dust in my media room.
And on my PS4, the disc games I can't even find. Most titles are digital buys and I've actually deleted from from the console since I'm not playing them. I find myself moving from new game to new game every 6 months or so. A few multi-player games I'll stick with periodically while it's active, but once the sequel is released I'll move on too.
Re: Google gets into game streaming with Project Stream
#114Have you checked out my company https://parsecgaming.com ? We offer this but also the ability to connect to your own computer and invite your friends to connect to your computer too.
I used Parsec for the first time maybe a week ago and I was really impressed by the site and software. It worked exactly for what I needed it for and was one of the easiest signup and setup processes I've seen. It was all-in-all easy, fast, and worked which is becoming more and more rare imo.
Re: Google gets into game streaming with Project Stream
#115Have you checked out my company https://parsecgaming.com ? We offer this but also the ability to connect to your own computer and invite your friends to connect to your computer too.
I used Parsec for the first time maybe a week ago and I was really impressed by the site and software. It worked exactly for what I needed it for and was one of the easiest signup and setup processes I've seen. It was all-in-all easy, fast, and worked which is becoming more and more rare imo.
Re: Google gets into game streaming with Project Stream
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're perfectly entitled to your own opinion of why you think it's terrible and why it will fail and is useless, etc (and I would agree with some of your points). But I just don't understand: > Just because some company wants us to do something or behave some way doesn't make us obligated to do so. Don't use it if you don't like it ? Google launching something doesn't mean you're "obligated" in any way, so I don't k…
You can opt out in the beginning, but later it becomes a monopoly. You can't even buy a game on a DVD anymore without it requiring Steam to install, activate, and play. So, in theory, if they succeed, it won't be optional anymore. "Oh then you can just stop playing games!" ... yes, but I would prefer not to. I would prefer a fair exchange of money for an unencumbered product. Hopefully, if I speak out now about the p…
Re: Google gets into game streaming with Project Stream
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
I used Parsec for the first time maybe a week ago and I was really impressed by the site and software. It worked exactly for what I needed it for and was one of the easiest signup and setup processes I've seen. It was all-in-all easy, fast, and worked which is becoming more and more rare imo.
What game were you playing?
Setup was super easy but my friend did say he was having a few visual issues because I was hosting and I have a 3440x1440 monitor. I didn't get to see what the issue was like but he did say it was manageable.