Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The problem is there no laws to stop whoever becomes the lucky recipient of such a network effect from doing whatever they want. There's the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Quoting from Wikipedia: > Since communications services exhibit network effects and positive externalities, new entrants would face barriers to entry if they could not interconnect their networks with those of the incumbent carriers. Thus, anoth…
Sounds like it goes in the right direction. So why isn't this being applied to whatsapp? Are they not considered a carrier? Wording it a bit weird, though. "interconnect their networks with one another"? If whatsapp made their client authenticate with their services so that their servers only work with their client and vice versa, would waiting for requests from would-be competitors to give them special access be suf…
WhatsApp sends Cease and Desists for apps that use native Android APIs
111–113 of 113 posts
Re: WhatsApp sends Cease and Desists for apps that use native Android APIs
#112Remember when Instant Messaging protocols used to be open? When there was a multitude of clients for any given service to chose from? Now IM has left its early adopter stage and became an integral part of everybody's life, but in doing so we became stuck with 100% proprietary WhatsApp. Not undeserved, it works very well with billions of users, and is probably the most usable IM service ever made. But it became so big…
Re: WhatsApp sends Cease and Desists for apps that use native Android APIs
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
In what way does ubiquity equate to superiority? Popularity does not confer superiority.
Haha of course it does, though perhaps not to you. If there were a superior alternative, people would use it. You're just defining this problem so narrowly has only the app itself or something. It's the network, the integrations, the history, etc.
[0]: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/guess-what-the-mos...