Live data from Hacker News

Apple Approves VLC For iPad

appadvice.com

111–118 of 118 posts

Re: Apple Approves VLC For iPad

#111
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you greatly overestimate the percentage of iOS users that even know what jailbreaking is.

I don't know about that. I know a lot of people with jailbroken iPhones, whom we'd all think of as "computer-illiterate" at best. Jailbreaking is very much a mainstream activity these days. Edit: I'll go so far as to speculate that the large proportion of jailbroken iOS devices is what is driving the glasnost at Apple lately. They are faced with keeping some control over their customers's devices, or losing the contr…

>the market has decisively rejected Apple's attempt at total control

If it's so decisive you must be able to cite it pretty easily, eh? I'm plenty "tech savvy" but I've never jailbroken my phone. I like the safety the App Store gives me. I don't have time to vet every damn application and I'm happy that some else does, even if they fail to let few a few things I might have liked.

Re: Apple Approves VLC For iPad

#112
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't disclaim that, proclaim it! Clearly it adds credibility. Thanks for the info. I'd consider working on VLC.

:D Still, I have to mention it on those comments, so people know I am biased...

Biased? Maybe, but in a good way. In any case, it definitely brings a degree of relevant authority to the topic.

Thanks for joining in :)

Re: Apple Approves VLC For iPad

#113
post #108
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is Windows Mobile 7 really a threat?

Not yet, but probably it in the future. Microsoft may not have got Windows Mobile right in the last 10 years but they now have a good template to follow (user interface, user experience, even the business model) thanks to Apple. You can see this with Windows Mobile 7 - they've 'rebooted' and are following Apple's lead. They're definitely the underdog but I wouldn't count them out.

Microsoft is launching Windows Phone 7 with a more restrictive development model than Apple.

The OS is just as locked-down as iOS, and as with Apple users are only allowed to install software from the official 'marketplace'; but Microsoft also restricts what license developers are allowed to release software under, and limits how many free applications they can offer without paying additional fees to MS.

The one advantage that Microsoft has traditionally had over Apple - the openness of their platforms - has been squandered.

Couple that with a featureset that is competitive with the first-edition iPhone, but nowhere matches current iOS and Android devices, and you have a recipe for a flop.

Re: Apple Approves VLC For iPad

#114
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I sometimes worry that the HN archives will eventually become so authoritative that actual discussion devolves into a chain of deeply idiomatic references to previous discussions, a la Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra .

Pg and the top idea. Jobs, when the walls fell.

In this metaphor, who's the invisible beast we have to work together to defeat?

Re: Apple Approves VLC For iPad

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know about that. I know a lot of people with jailbroken iPhones, whom we'd all think of as "computer-illiterate" at best. Jailbreaking is very much a mainstream activity these days. Edit: I'll go so far as to speculate that the large proportion of jailbroken iOS devices is what is driving the glasnost at Apple lately. They are faced with keeping some control over their customers's devices, or losing the contr…

>the market has decisively rejected Apple's attempt at total control If it's so decisive you must be able to cite it pretty easily, eh? I'm plenty "tech savvy" but I've never jailbroken my phone. I like the safety the App Store gives me. I don't have time to vet every damn application and I'm happy that some else does, even if they fail to let few a few things I might have liked.

If it's so decisive you must be able to cite it pretty easily, eh?

Google returns "about 1,150,000 results" for the term jailbreakme. I think that'll do.

Re: Apple Approves VLC For iPad

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>the market has decisively rejected Apple's attempt at total control If it's so decisive you must be able to cite it pretty easily, eh? I'm plenty "tech savvy" but I've never jailbroken my phone. I like the safety the App Store gives me. I don't have time to vet every damn application and I'm happy that some else does, even if they fail to let few a few things I might have liked.

If it's so decisive you must be able to cite it pretty easily, eh? Google returns "about 1,150,000 results" for the term jailbreakme . I think that'll do.

You're pretty easy to convince. Even if every single one of those results represented a person who jail broke their phone then there are still several times more people who haven't then have. I don't think the phrase "decisively rejected by the market" means what you think it means.

Re: Apple Approves VLC For iPad

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it's so decisive you must be able to cite it pretty easily, eh? Google returns "about 1,150,000 results" for the term jailbreakme . I think that'll do.

You're pretty easy to convince. Even if every single one of those results represented a person who jail broke their phone then there are still several times more people who haven't then have. I don't think the phrase "decisively rejected by the market" means what you think it means.

Translation: "I don't like the data."

Re: Apple Approves VLC For iPad

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're pretty easy to convince. Even if every single one of those results represented a person who jail broke their phone then there are still several times more people who haven't then have. I don't think the phrase "decisively rejected by the market" means what you think it means.

Translation: "I don't like the data."

what data? One Google query? Again, you seem to not understand how this whole "research" thing works. I really hope you're not a real life reporter because you're either being extremely intellectually lazy with your "argument" or you're trying to be purposely deceptive (again, in an extremely lazy manner). The only real data that's actually been provided shows the exact opposite of your ignorant "decisively rejected" quote.

It's funny when people spend so much effort trying to defend an obviously nonsensical statement. You were wrong. So what? We all say things that turn out to be incorrect, it's no big deal.

Post reply on HN