111–120 of 164 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> "testing in production" indeed. One of my repos has been stuck in limbo for over 2 months now > after I attempted to migrate it to a group namespace from my own profile. Have you created an issue for this on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/support-forum/issues ?
Yes I have, there was no response to it and it was recently closed, I believe.
GitLab is unusable without JavaScript enabled. It's disappointing to see free software projects even consider adopting it.
What is it that you are claiming is unusable without JavaScript?
GNOME already started, check out https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME
At GitLab we're tracking the blocking issues they've brought up in this issue[2].
[0]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Infrastructure/issues [1]: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/ [2]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/35287
Earlier quoted context omitted.
We claim it based on the assumption that almost all very large companies (enterprise) host their own source code and they are switching to git. We have 2/3 market share with self hosted git as shown with two data points https://about.gitlab.com/is-it-any-good/#gitlab-has-23-marke... I'll consider adding the rationale to the page. We're seeing organizations adopt SaaS but the largest companies tend to be the last ones…
I dunno. I do R&D tax credit studies for hundreds of enterprise software firms and I always ask what version control system(s) they use and where/how it is hosted. I would guesstimate between a third and a half use GitLab in some capacity. And even then a lot of the time it's only for some teams or some projects. I do work with a disproportionate number of MS shops and a disproportionate number of medium to large com…
What breakdown of version control systems you seeing? If between a third and a half use GitLab I would love to know what the rest are using.
GitLab is unusable without JavaScript enabled. It's disappointing to see free software projects even consider adopting it.
Just navigated my own running instance of gitlab-omnibus with Firefox's javascript.enabled set to false. It looks fine to me-- I can navigate, view the issues, and presumably post comments. What is it that you are claiming is unusable without JavaScript?
Issues (such as https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/json-glib/issues/26) show the initial message, but not the comments.
(I'm sure that's just tip of the iceberg.)
I was under the impression that Debian is in the process of moving to Pagure [1]. The reasons mentioned in the LWN article are not invalidated by Gitlab's announcement of dropping the CLA. [1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/724986/
My understanding from the mailing list is that they're planning on using GitLab, at least that's what I heard last. I could always be wrong.
> GitLab, a software product used by 2/3 of all enterprises, ... This claim is false. The linked survey shows that GitLab has a 2/3 market share in self-hosted Git providers. Not every enterprise self-hosts a git repository.
I bought this up on HN in the past[1], but it gets instantly downvoted( by gitlab employees?) , my comment was a response to CEO claiming how their marketing is honest[2]. They also declared Gitlab CI as number one CI by excluding Jenkins because of their made up defintion of "modern" . 1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15590240 2. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15589654
Marketing folks aren't technical enough to understand CI anyway. This is why marketing folks shouldn't step on us tech folks toes - you'll just look like an idiot and end up embarrassing yourself.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I bought this up on HN in the past[1], but it gets instantly downvoted( by gitlab employees?) , my comment was a response to CEO claiming how their marketing is honest[2]. They also declared Gitlab CI as number one CI by excluding Jenkins because of their made up defintion of "modern" . 1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15590240 2. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15589654
Last time I checked Jenkins is a modern CI product.