Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, there hasn't been any hard evidence that records were manipulated (AFAIK). But I don't see how our response should be substantively different knowing they altered records vs. just having had access to the databases.
> But I don't see how our response should be substantively different knowing they altered records vs. just having had access to the databases. Well, you claimed that Russians hacked our elections, when there is no hard evidence they did. I'm not sure why you had to resort to lying.
This is exactly what I said:
>I guess you missed the news about their attempted and successful intrusions into state election databases?
which is borne out by the evidence.