Earlier quoted context omitted.
> We're talking about a system engineered from the ground up to produce quasi-feudalism Funny, that's what socialism ends up producing, with the nomenklatura in charge. > that fails to address even the most basic needs of the majority Again, this is what socialism results in. > and has a built in auto-destruct due to it's reliance on unlimited continuous growth despite relying on finite non-renewable resources. This…
> This is factually incorrect. Economic growth can come from reducing use of resources. Yeah, it really isn't. At best you can produce a handful of outliers that support this point. Meanwhile there's the rest of the economy. I'm guessing you won't enjoy a review of the growth of shipping and logistics internationally if you're trying to sell someone on this bit of mythology. Also, piss on your whataboutism, it fails…
Re: Let Forest Fires Burn
#111You have no idea what you're talking about, and are ignoring most of the 20th Century.