Live data from Hacker News

NSA OSS Technologies

nationalsecurityagency.github.io

111–114 of 114 posts

Re: NSA OSS Technologies

#111
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For breaking the law and working to undermine the Constitution? Is that not a big enough claim? Maybe blame specific people (the DIR NSA Hayden, Bush, Obama). There was a strong culture at NSA of NOT spying on Americans until those clowns came along.

But spying on other people is okay, simply because where they had the audacity to be born? Nations are fictions and depriving rights to a group that you permit to others based on nationality is entirely unjust. I blame the specific people who built these systems to collect and process data for the military.

Would you rather that nations didn't spy on each other? I wouldn't. Effective spying helps prevent war, and lack of intel leads to wars.

If the British had had better intel they would never have invaded Afghanistan to repulse an imaginary Russian annexation. If intel had been listened to, instead of deliberately ignored/fabricated by Bush we wouldn't have invaded Iraq because of imaginary WMDs. If Kennedy hadn't actively understood the intel on Cuba, and just left it to the fears of the generals, the US would have invaded Cuba. The biggest fear of the Warsaw Pact is that the West would invade -- which was the West's fear also -- to the point that a lack of intelligence on Western force movements almost resulted in a counter-premptive invasion.

So maybe nations are fictions, but they are pretty powerful ones that most people are happy to roll with, and that makes the consequences real. These same people can agree on a set of collective norms that control who/what/where can be surveilled.

The propaganda that there are many ISIS terrorists embedded in Western nations is the key lever which will be used to transition from military/national intelligence to the surveillance state. This can't be won by railing against the NSA, but by countering (islamic and fascist) extremism, false reporting and propaganda.

And yet in the mean time we are being outflanked by traditional nation state adversaries using strategic propaganda campaigns. And they won't hesitate to spy on us. I want NSA(/GCHQ/DGSE/8200) working hard to prevent that, instead of navel gazing illegal programs about spying on environmentalists/unionists/politicans.

Re: NSA OSS Technologies

#112
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bleach has been used in bombs around the world, should I not use it because there's a chance it's been used for (perceived) evil?

Cluster bombs have such blatant propaganda spread against them by well-meaning but naive individuals. Don't be fooled - look at all their positive uses!

That's not a like for like comparison, one is a bomb designed for destruction, one is software designed to solve a problem. The software isn't designed to kill, maim, or destroy, if it can be used as part of the process that doesn't make the software itself evil. Should we throw out linux systems since linux powers many control systems in war machines?

Re: NSA OSS Technologies

#113
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But spying on other people is okay, simply because where they had the audacity to be born? Nations are fictions and depriving rights to a group that you permit to others based on nationality is entirely unjust. I blame the specific people who built these systems to collect and process data for the military.

Would you rather that nations didn't spy on each other? I wouldn't. Effective spying helps prevent war, and lack of intel leads to wars. If the British had had better intel they would never have invaded Afghanistan to repulse an imaginary Russian annexation. If intel had been listened to, instead of deliberately ignored/fabricated by Bush we wouldn't have invaded Iraq because of imaginary WMDs. If Kennedy hadn't acti…

What about using the state infrastructure/technology to spy in the Brazilian state oil company and steal engineering secrets to hand to american competitors?

Re: NSA OSS Technologies

#114
post #12

This caught my eye: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk > Employing homomorphic encryption techniques, PIR enables datasets to remain resident in their native locations while giving the ability to query the datasets with sensitive terms. I can imagine a few scenarios there. One perhaps is when db admin should not find out what someone, possibly working on a classified project is querying. Or say one compartmen…

I guess an example might be that the NSA has access to other partners information (e.g non-five eyes like Germany) and doesn't want their DB folks to be able to see that they are quering against the databases (e.g Merkels phone number)

This is exactly what PIR is for. A good intro is chapter 6 of the (awesome and ahead-of-its-time) book Malicious Cryptography. One of the authors works at the agency now, I believe.
Post reply on HN