Live data from Hacker News

Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

blogs.msdn.microsoft.com

111–120 of 124 posts

Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

#111
> Because that blinking colon and the constantly-updating time were killing our benchmark numbers.

Like Visual Studio Code uses 12% CPU in idle due to cursor blinking? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13940014

In comparison the Windows Shell (up to Win7) is a lot more efficient and coded in C/C++.

Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

#112
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>On a more practical note, why would you want to have seconds on the clock? for timing things. For example, it's super easy to check a heart rate if you don't need to provide timing or rhythm. Or waiting on ramen , or steeping tea. Lots of reasons.

Just click on the clock, it will pop a window with seconds in it.

For anyone running Win95 wondering why this doesn't work: You need to double-click, guys.

Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

#113

And on current systems, updating every second would decrease battery life by preventing your system from sleeping. Modern systems can easily sleep for more than a second at a time, even with the screen on (and not updating). I also, personally, can't stand to have distractions like that on my screen away from where I want to focus.

> Modern systems can easily sleep for more than a second at a time, even with the screen on (and not updating).

Good luck with that with quadrillion services chugging away in the background including file indexing service and all the spying bullshit.

Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

#114
post #45
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can't watch on either Chrome or Firefox. Apple are real gits.

Neither Chrome or Firefox support HLS on the desktop despite providing support on mobile (since Android 3.0 I believe). They have categorically refused to add desktop support, if you have any complaints I would take it up with them.

[deleted]

Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would they support a closed, proprietary format when there exist better, open ones?

What is a better one? A patent pool has formed around DASH and you need to buy a license to use it: http://www.mpegla.com/main/programs/MPEG-DASH/Pages/Intro.as...

Use a plain file? It's not like that video is a real time feed anymore.

Otherwise, include a js player with HLS support for other browsers.

Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

#116
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>On a more practical note, why would you want to have seconds on the clock? for timing things. For example, it's super easy to check a heart rate if you don't need to provide timing or rhythm. Or waiting on ramen , or steeping tea. Lots of reasons.

Just click on the clock, it will pop a window with seconds in it.

That doesn't work when you need to be clicking around and focusing other windows while keeping time.

Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

#117
post #60
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Windows 95 hypetrain was truly something to behold. The Empire State Building lights in Windows colors, Friends castmembers appearing in a (truly lame) promotional video... Windows 95 was the release that put the phrase "operating system" on the common man's lips -- for better or worse.

I'd never heard of this "Friends castmembers" video, so I did a bit of YouTubing... I have no words (nearly an hour long, and I think there's a part-two): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGYcNcFhctc This led me to a few other videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2owaKucyU1Y Sigh. The 90s.

The 90s were really great in a lot of ways. But as you've shown, it was really awful in a few others.

I wonder if there's a parallel universe out there where Windows 95 never happened and Microsoft went out of business somehow. That would be the universe where the 90s were a truly wondrous age.

Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

#118
post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Starting a phone interview on time Down to the second?

Not a second, but a minute is too coarse

You must be toying with us. Please, tell me it is a joke. I can't find literally any reason to start a phone call down to seconds. What's wrong with starting it just when minutes counter changes?

Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

#119
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You must not work in an organization that insists on installing security software for you. If I have >2w uptime on my machine I generally have to restart for some reason or other. It's like people have forgotten that computers can and should have more uptime than that. A faulty update from one of our security software vendors caused a once-per-hour kernel panic and forced reboot for a day or two. It was really nice.…

I feel you there. It got to the point at one gig where engineering folks--who were given root on their preconfigured laptops--often spent their first day figuring out how to kill and extricate Sophos from their machines. For developers who weren't seasoned jerks, it could be a real challenge until somebody took pity on them and helped them find single-user mode, yank out the kexts, and manually delete everything. (Th…

Is it still possible to do this kind of thing on the most recent macOS? I recall the issue with the 'git' binary not being modifiable, even with sudo, unless you mounted the macOS filesystem under Linux and made the changes from there.

Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)

#120
post #4

On a more practical note, why would you want to have seconds on the clock? I find that most of the time I don't want to know the time to a precision of better than 5 minutes. That may just be me, but when someone asks the time and I read it off my phone as 3:56 it really bothers me and sometimes I convert that to 5-to-4 just to avoid what in most cases is arbitrary extra precision. Sure there are times when minutes c…

Some years ago, I would set the clock of my linux (ubuntu? gnome? don't remember specifics) to display a "fuzzy time". It would tell time in that way : a quarter to eleven... two and a half... And it was very good, instead of worrying if I was being productive by checking the time twice every minute, I would just let it go.

This was a KDE thing. I'm unsure if it still has the option now.
Post reply on HN