Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are misrepresenting the opposing argument being made. The opposing argument is that people are making is as follows: 'climate-alarmists' misuse climate-science as a means of making political change. It is not a denial of all climate-change science. I don't care to argue this topic because I'm not expert nor do I care to pretend to be one on the topic of climate change, but this misrepresentation of the opposing v…
Are you unaware of the hundreds of times Trump has literally claimed all climate change science is a hoax, or are you saying his view is unimportant?
Could you please refer me to where he said that 'all climate change science is a hoax'? I would agree that would be a factually incorrect statement though I could not find anything where he said that. My interpretation of what I've read from what Trump has said, is that Trump believes that Climate Change Alarmists (from his perspective) utilize it to for political/policy reasons beyond the purely environmental reasons that they claim.