Live data from Hacker News

Visual Studio Code 1.7

code.visualstudio.com

111–120 of 180 posts

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.7

#111

I can't see horizontal layouts. I reinstalled from scratch and still can't see it.

"To enable horizontal layout for the current workspace, use: The View menu Toggle Editor Group Layout."

Ah, it's one or the other. That sucks but thanks for the clarification.

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.7

#112

I'm going to have to rate this as "probably never going to work". I really wanted it to succeed, because I actually like Microsoft and want a new editor, but the pure amount of ignorance this thing began with and continues to display is just too much. * Didn't launch with tabs, a plugin system, or code folding * Still no Projects or Workspace. You can open a "Folder", which behaves like a workspace, but you can only…

You can have different instances of VSC open if you want to use 2 different workspaces at the same time. On Windows I just right-click the task bar and do "New Window" for that.

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.7

#113
I wish wish wish MS would add built in, offline spell checking. The plugins I've tried are pretty buggy, and I would love to spell check markdown and documentation. (Also, spell check applied only to comments would be cool too!)

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.7

#114
post #40

When MS gets into something, they really get into it. VS Code has exceeded pretty much all my expectations with the pace it has been progressing at.

The biggest thing for me has been the consistency. They already had an amazing IDE (Visual Studio), then they buckled down and made an amazing paired-down version (VSCode). It works well, does all the things I'd want and then some. Compare to Google releasing a chat client / message handler (google voice app), another one (hangouts), taking away functionality (removing shared sms/hangouts convos), then releasing two…

> an amazing paired-down version

FYI, and no judgement: the word is "pare", meaning "to trim" or "to cut down".

Also seen in "paring knife" :-)

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.7

#115
post #40

When MS gets into something, they really get into it. VS Code has exceeded pretty much all my expectations with the pace it has been progressing at.

The biggest thing for me has been the consistency. They already had an amazing IDE (Visual Studio), then they buckled down and made an amazing paired-down version (VSCode). It works well, does all the things I'd want and then some. Compare to Google releasing a chat client / message handler (google voice app), another one (hangouts), taking away functionality (removing shared sms/hangouts convos), then releasing two…

You can pretty easily run Windows natively on a MacBook Pro. I've been using a MacBook Pro as my full-time Windows machine for about seven good years.

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.7

#117
They had to rollback the update:

> Unfortunately, we needed to roll back the 1.7 release of VS Code. One of the great new features in 1.7 is the automatic acquisition of typing files when writing JavaScript and TypeScript. These typings files drive the IntelliSense (code completions) experience in the tool. The feature was so great that we started to overload the npmjs.org service. The right thing to do in the short term was to revert the release. If you had already upgraded to 1.7 you would have been prompted to install another update and you should now be at 1.6.1 again. We apologize for this inconvenience and we're working hard to make both short and long term fixes to bring you a great editing experience in VS Code.

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.7

#118

Not a negative comment in the thread so far. That's amazing for something Microsoft, as anyone who's been around here can attest. There's a corner being turned here; time to buy MSFT?

Sure, if you wanna buy when $MSFT is the highest it's been since the dot com era. Right about five months ago would've been a good time, though.

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.7

#119
post #29

The one unfortunate thing about it is that it doesn't work/isn't packaged for Raspberry Pi. I don't understand why they don't make a package for the pi, if it's a JS app anyways

What I also don't understand is why doesn't Debian package it? Is it not fully free or does it have licencing issues like Atom?
Post reply on HN