Live data from Hacker News

Visual Studio Code 1.4

code.visualstudio.com

111–120 of 155 posts

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.4

#111
post #94
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you tried Qt Creator? Its really good for normal C++ development and even better for Qt specific development.

A colleague uses it on OSX, and it's awful: unstable, crashes, hangs during debugging, the debugger doesn't always update the displayed values, doesn't grok auto declarations, etc. So far, Netbeans is the best free C++ IDE I've tried.

What about KDevelop?

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.4

#112
post #51

Number one drawback of VSCode, for me, is poor vim keybindings, especially visual mode. If that was fixed I'd use it extensively.

It's easy to modify key bindings to emulate popular editors. For example, Emacs key bindings are trivial to emulate.

But Vim/Vi don't just have keybindings; they have modes. Emulating editor modes is a significant undertaking. It's not just a change to the settings file -- it requires a lot of programming work. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for Microsoft to emulate Vim modes in VS Code. A plugin is your best bet.

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.4

#113

I'm not particular about what editor you choose. I've been looking for a good JS IDE. Webstorm is of course the only real player in this space (with an amazing IDE) but it's pricey. I've been watching VSCode with great interest. However, every time I try the editor it's a huge letdown. Buggy, crashy, shitty and weird interface (they have completely made up their own tabbing/splitting paradigm for example, which is bu…

VS Code does not claim to be an IDE.

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.4

#114
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Me too. I was a bit skeptic at first. Been a long time vim user but wanted to try something new. I now use it to code Python (I write a lot of it). It works very nicely. So much that I'm in the process of making it the official company -wide text editor for python at work.

As part of the Visual Studio Code effort, the .net intellisense was split into a stand lone server to be used from any editor. So I'm going the opposite way, hoping to do more and more in vim and less in VS.

Do you have more details on this? I'd love to be able to use the .NET intellisense in something other than Visual Studio. Thanks!

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.4

#115
I'm sure it's a great editor but it's, to me at least, a bit weird to have to read a privacy statement for an editor to work out what it's actually sending home.

https://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/dn948229

I guess it's open source though so if anyone's really bothered they could fork it and take all that stuff out.

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.4

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Me too. I was a bit skeptic at first. Been a long time vim user but wanted to try something new. I now use it to code Python (I write a lot of it). It works very nicely. So much that I'm in the process of making it the official company -wide text editor for python at work.

How did you manage to leave vim keys so easily?

There's a vim key extension that's pretty good too.

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.4

#117
post #115

I'm sure it's a great editor but it's, to me at least, a bit weird to have to read a privacy statement for an editor to work out what it's actually sending home. https://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/dn948229 I guess it's open source though so if anyone's really bothered they could fork it and take all that stuff out.

You can disable all telemetry in configurations.

Re: Visual Studio Code 1.4

#120
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As part of the Visual Studio Code effort, the .net intellisense was split into a stand lone server to be used from any editor. So I'm going the opposite way, hoping to do more and more in vim and less in VS.

Do you have more details on this? I'd love to be able to use the .NET intellisense in something other than Visual Studio. Thanks!

http://www.omnisharp.net
Post reply on HN