Live data from Hacker News

Securing a travel iPhone

blog.filippo.io

111–113 of 113 posts

Re: Securing a travel iPhone

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Believe what you want but at least read it through first. This isn't about powering a cell phone via wireless power and make it connect to a cell tower this is about inducing enough power into the cell phone's RF parts to make it modulate the signal sufficiently to be able to be picked up. Essentially this isn't that much different than the passive wifi or any other backscatter communication based system. I've seen t…

As I read it, that's a fine way to detect the presence of a cell phone. It might be able to discriminate between several models of cell phones. But it will not be able to identify a specific cell phone. Am I misreading your statements?

Yes, I said it was used to track cell phones in low density areas back when they were simply enough for this trick to work, what I assume is that if someone back then had a cell phone/radio phone/sat phone or anything similar with a susceptible transmitter in the middle of nowhere-stan you could probably identify them via other means, or at least be able to classify them sufficiently.

Re: Securing a travel iPhone

#112
post #90
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you expect you can reliably turn off your phone (7 seconds) before you get in a search situation, then use a full password instead of a numeric pin, then touch ID is a great balance of convenience and security. TouchID also prevents shoulder surfing of your code. It's all about the threat model.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it also possible to just use one of your fingers that you didn't register with touch ID for 5 or so consecutive unlock attempts and it will have the same effect as rebooting your phone?

That will stop you using Touch ID thereafter, but it's quite slow to do in practice.

As an aside, I've found that, at least with my iPhone 5S, if my finger is wet (e.g. if I've licked it), it also is rejected.

Re: Securing a travel iPhone

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As I read it, that's a fine way to detect the presence of a cell phone. It might be able to discriminate between several models of cell phones. But it will not be able to identify a specific cell phone. Am I misreading your statements?

Yes, I said it was used to track cell phones in low density areas back when they were simply enough for this trick to work, what I assume is that if someone back then had a cell phone/radio phone/sat phone or anything similar with a susceptible transmitter in the middle of nowhere-stan you could probably identify them via other means, or at least be able to classify them sufficiently.

That makes sense. I think I veered off into confusion from the comment about the inductively-powered LEDs.
Post reply on HN