Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really? Because Amazon, Netflix, Facebook, and Google all have stake in the MySQL ring (google least so). MySQL has a lot of good knowns at scale, too.
All companies old enough to have a lot of legacy infrastructure from before it was common knowledge that Postgres is better. It would be more curious why MySQL would be adopted today than 10-15 years ago.
If you're doing things with replication logs, mysql replication logs are a heck of a lot simpler, and there's more tooling for them in the OSS world
That said, I do use postgres a lot :)