Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's their job to do what they're told. If the city government decided Bike Crime was a top priority, cops got promotions based on how many bikes they recaptured, etc. then presumably they would be more active. Conversely, when the government decides it doesn't want a law enforced it's very easy to make that clear. Laws are an excuse to be able to target kinds of activity the government wants to target at the time; i…
So what exactly is the priority of San Francisco, it's DA, and police department? I ask because I haven't been able to figure that out in 20 years of living here. From what I can tell, the police are good people, but the DA's are generally useless and are only interested in pushing an alternative social agenda as opposed to enforcing the laws passed by previous generations.
I mean, it sure fits the evidence. No one has an interest in "enforcing laws", they're tools to exert the power they wish to exert. In SF, I guess that's balancing property values that give you the cash to run further political campaigns with the social agenda shit that they think gets votes.
Police don't really have independent priorities beyond "paychecks & cool shit with minimal accountability" (in fairness, basically the same priorities as any other job, especially government jobs). They are mostly the penultimate shelf on which shit, rolling downhill, rests (the public gets to be the final one).