Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's also versioned backup, like Time Machine. Not just a clone of the latest.
You can do this with rsync as well, including the hardlinked-to-older file method. Have a look at the `--link-dest` option to rsync.
Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
111–120 of 194 posts
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#112Love arq too. Rumor has it arq 5 will also stop eating up free space with its cache.noindex folder. Excited about that!
True! It uses sqlite databases (finally). (I work at Haystack Software :)
I was excluding cache.noindex from my other backup system (carbon copy cloner). Is it still safe to do so?
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#113Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#114Awesome, got an email about an hour ago stating I received a free upgrade to 5 from my 4 license. Been using Arq for a couple years now, it's been a perfect solution for offsite backups.
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#115Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#116Given the rise of ransomware in the recent months, what protection does Arq offer against that? That thing alone would easily tip the scales for me versus the Time Machine. I see that the AWS S3 IAM user has both read and write access, so if the ransomware authors ever bother with it, they can kill the backups. Would that help if I setup versioning on the bucket? Will Arq be able to restore backups from the older ver…
I know there was some hue and cry a little while ago about Mac ransomware that can encrypt network drives and external hard drives, but there's a reason why the _encrypt_timemachine routine was an unused stub. From what I understand, Time Machine has protections built into the kernel that prevents existing backups from being modified. New backups after the ransomware attack would obviously end up backing up encrypted data, but the existing backups should remain untouched.
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
Its $50 one time purchase for new purchase. The upgrade from Arq 4 is $25. During store checkout, you can also choose to add a "Lifetime Upgrades" at $30 which will give you free upgrades for Arq 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 etc.
I purchased the Lifetime Upgrades in September 2015. Now it tells me there is a $25 upgrade fee to go to version 5. I emailed support a few hours ago to confirm. If this is true, I am extremely disappointed and feel cheated. Notice on the form to buy a new license it doesn't say anything about "Lifetime Upgrades for this major version _only_ which will be obsolete in a few months". I sure hope this is just a bug that…
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#118"Error establishing a database connection"
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's also versioned backup, like Time Machine. Not just a clone of the latest.
You can do this with rsync as well, including the hardlinked-to-older file method. Have a look at the `--link-dest` option to rsync.
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#120I would just like to point out that this is major release 5 and they're just now adding threading and consumption of filesystem events. That's _great_ from the standpoint of launching a product. Putting off adding this complexity probably let them get to market sooner. If I were releasing something like Arq, I would have to fight myself very, very hard to not add these to the 0.1 release. I don't know this space very…
From my uneducated perspective, having simple software that just worked was a bonus - who knows, maybe with the addition of threading, and consumption of filesystem events, ARQ is going to become crummy, and a door will be opened for someone else to write simple backup software without those features that gets the job done and doesn't bog up your computer. I guess we'll have to try Arq 5 for a few weeks to find out. Fingers Crossed.