Live data from Hacker News

The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

theguardian.com

111–120 of 198 posts

Re: The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

#111
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(1) Not really. The liver does a good job of handling small amounts of fructose, as present in many sweet fruits and such. But in high quantities, as in HFCS soda, it's unable to cope and you will end up with waaaaay too much triglycerides. Which, unlike glucose, cannot be regulated by insulin.

Have you looked at the numbers for fruit juice vs soda? Fruit juice has more fructose than most sugars. None of the orange juice on the shelves is even made from squeezed oranges. They add flavor packs (often made from oranges so they can get away with it being 100% juice; and yes this goes for the natural/organic brands as well). When you consume oranges, the fiber helps your body feel full. The fiber also helps red…

"Fake" fruit juice is not juice. If you fresh squeeze an orange it's not the same as most of the crap made from concentrate in the store. Also if you buy cherry juice or such from most stores it's 90% apple juice. The ingredients are listed in order. I hate this kind of trickery at the store.

Re: The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

#112
post #6

This story always remind me of this interesting study done on rats, where they found sugar more tantalizing than cocaine or heroine.[0] Take it with a grain of salt (or sugar, if you prefer), since sugar has some nutritional value, but this is a little terrifying. Look at the obese, particularly in the USA, and look at these massive buckets of soda they drink, breads stuffed with 20+grams of sugar, sweets which are l…

"The public needs education" is the absolute wrong answer to the obesity epidemic. The public has been receiving education. That sugar is bad is not news. We need to start questioning why the health and medical industries' attempts at addressing the obesity epidemic have thus far been abject failures.

Re: The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

#113
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everything you said. I've been treating sugar as personal health enemy #1 for quite a few years now. Note: I am deeply addicted to sugar. It has been absurdly and embarrassingly hard for me to abstain from high sugar foods. I can eat a healthy, high-protein meal, and be full. Yet 30 minutes later, I will feel hungry again. But checking in with my stomach: still full. I can eat a few grams of sugar and feel instantly…

I think it feels irrational because these high protein, low carb diets are really meant up be weight loss diets, not the diet of an active human with healthy fat and muscle levels. In that case, whole grains and vegetables, fruits and the like along with the supplemental meats and nuts are normal. If you're genetically disposed, throw in some whole fat, no sugar added dairy. I think all this confusion arises because…

Actually, I have been hearing more and more about athletes who train in ketosis. It would be especially attractive to an ultramarathon athlete to be able to burn fat for fuel. (This relates more to a high-fat diet than a high-protein diet you mention.)

I've seen a video by Dr. Peter Attia, who was a triathlete, but found he carried a lot of body fat despite his training regimin. https://youtu.be/hB7aGnfLB-8

Re: The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

#114
post #92
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn't adopting a balanced diet that's reasonably low in carbs plus some exercise achieve the desired effect but without fucking shit up in the process? I can't imagine going from a sedentary, high-carb, overweight lifestyle to a radical diet(be it keto or whatever else the person chooses) is easy on the body. Did you get any lab tests done before and after starting the diet? If you did, how did the results compare…

> Did you get any lab tests done before and after starting the diet? If you did, how did the results compare? Only my normal annual blood test. Cholesterol was down after the diet, everything else was pretty much unchanged. We never caught the stone for analysis, but the diet was pinned as the most likely cause. To be fair, I don't have enough data to say it was the diet for certain, only correlations that people who…

I see, thanks. It'd be interesting to have people take a lab test right before going on a keto diet and then repeating it at fixed intervals to see how it affects the results.

Re: The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

#115
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wasn't really implying that everyone should start a ketogenic diet. Just stating the success that I've had with it, and also noting several common misconceptions that are still largely heard today.

I didn't say you were implying anything, what I said was I find it astounding how little actual data you seem to have collected, compared to the sweeping conclusions you're drawing. I take issue with your condescending tone, because it doesn't fit whatsoever with your clear ignorance on the topic. I'm particularly sensitive to the topic of food, because people in your situation (who have found success but have no ide…

Ya know "sophilistic nature of your comment is astounding", "astounding how little actual data", "your clear ignorance" isn't very HN guidelines. Bit unfair too - after all it's the top comment on this thread.

Re: The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

#116

As someone who has shifted to a sugar-free, high-fat lifestyle (keto diet), I can attest to the fact that sugar really is the ultimate evil in terms of health and nutrition. I've lost about 100lbs in 2.5 years... The only thing that I really changed was doing a Keto diet. I've learned a lot about nutrition along the way, and it's amazing how bad nutrition info was when I was growing up.. Common Misconceptions I hear/…

"2) A calorie is a calorie... No. Your body does not process all foods the same. A thousand calories of broccoli will effect your body VERY differently than a thousand calories of soda. Yes the energy-intake might be the same, but the resulting effects are very different."

Honest question: I've seen conflicting answers on this - some sources I've read saying a calorie is a calorie - others that agree with you. Does anyone have a scientific or other reference?

Re: The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

#117
post #105
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd say 1000 calories is a little much, but I think the original point here still stands. I don't have nutrition facts sitting right in front of me, but I do know often times cereal is given in very small quantities, like 130 calories per 3/4 cup. I'd say I used to eat around 3 cups of cereal each morning, so that's 520 calories not counting milk and OJ. The Milk is usually 1 cup, about 110 calories I believe. And 2…

You used to eat 3 cups of cereal every morning? That's a lot of cereal. If I were hungry enough to eat that much cereal, I'd probably want something that felt more substantial (e.g. eggs, breakfast sandwich). I mean, yes, it's totally possible to eat 1000 calories for breakfast. I still don't think it's typical. Why would you even want that OJ after eating 3 whole cups of cereal? Also, how do you not just end up hype…

A medium bowl takes 2.5 cups to be a full cereal bowl. You should measure out 2 cups of cereal and see how small it is.

Re: The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

#118

Several years ago I was addicted to coca-cola, drinking daily even 2L - I probably exceeded the daily recommended amount of sugar 4 or 5 times. Since then I've drastically reduced sugar in my diet and luckily I never had a problem with weight, but I wonder what'll be the long-term effects of intaking so much sugar for such long time. The scary thing, now that I check the ingredients of everything I buy, is how much s…

There are 212 grams of sugar in a 2L of coke. According to the World Health Organization recommendation of 25g/day or fewer, that would clock in at about 8.5 times the recommended maximum. So yeah, coke has lots of sugar, even twice as much as you guessed.

Re: The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

#119

As someone who has shifted to a sugar-free, high-fat lifestyle (keto diet), I can attest to the fact that sugar really is the ultimate evil in terms of health and nutrition. I've lost about 100lbs in 2.5 years... The only thing that I really changed was doing a Keto diet. I've learned a lot about nutrition along the way, and it's amazing how bad nutrition info was when I was growing up.. Common Misconceptions I hear/…

1) Actual pressed juice is fine. The matter gets confused when people don't realize that a glass of actual orange juice is 6+ oranges worth of juice. You wouldn't eat a dozen oranges without thinking about the caloric intake. But you'd drink a few glasses of OJ because it's not as filling. 2) Thermodynamics... That said, a thousand calories of soda is half a day's worth of energy in sugar form. Your body uses sugar f…

> 2) Thermodynamics...

Yes, thermodynamics. However, if you eat five hundred calories per day, you will a) feel miserable, b) be constantly thinking of food, and c) perhaps die, even if there is fat hanging around in the body to be used up. This demonstrates that we're not idealised food-burning machines, but food-burning machines which adjust their desire to take in fuel depending on how the machine is operating. It is very, very difficult to stand a low-calorie diet for more than a few weeks, if the diet is administered in the wrong way with the result that you crave more food all the time. By contrast, some people (like me, and several others on this thread) find it day-to-day easy to eat below maintenance if carbs are cut out. (Although personally I have never been able stand no-carb for more than about a month, so no-carb doesn't really work for me if I want to lose weight.)

Re: The sugar conspiracy: sugar—not fat—is the greatest danger to our health

#120

As someone who has shifted to a sugar-free, high-fat lifestyle (keto diet), I can attest to the fact that sugar really is the ultimate evil in terms of health and nutrition. I've lost about 100lbs in 2.5 years... The only thing that I really changed was doing a Keto diet. I've learned a lot about nutrition along the way, and it's amazing how bad nutrition info was when I was growing up.. Common Misconceptions I hear/…

"2) A calorie is a calorie... No. Your body does not process all foods the same. A thousand calories of broccoli will effect your body VERY differently than a thousand calories of soda. Yes the energy-intake might be the same, but the resulting effects are very different." Honest question: I've seen conflicting answers on this - some sources I've read saying a calorie is a calorie - others that agree with you. Does a…

Maybe start here: http://www.responsiblefoods.org/a_calorie_is_not_a_calorie

From Mr. Lustig himself: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-lustig-md/sugar-toxic_b...

Post reply on HN