I Hope to see GitLab, and other Truly Open Systems, replace GitHub as the go to place for source control
I used bitbucket for a long time because it did the job and it provided private repos. But after I had to start looking for another job, many employers wanted to see my github profile.
GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart
111–120 of 1001 posts
Re: GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another quote is "it is very hard to even interview people who are 'white'". This is absurd and disgusting. I haven't lived in the US for a while, but lately, I keep hearing all these expressions of straight up racial hatred of white people, all the way up to taking pleasure in white people "dying off" and so on. This kind of thing can't end well and needs to be stopped.
To even express that it's absurd will likely brand you as a racist. What in the fuck is happening?
Re: GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart
#113> "We’re trying to build a new kind of enterprise company where the playbooks of old won’t always work" By replacing flat meritocracy and remote work with traditional top-down management? > "don't think we'll succeed teaching white, male middle managers empathy and compassion anytime soon, so let's limit their scope of damage" So the technical director and member of the social-impact team is a blatant racist.
Re: GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart
#114> While their efforts are admirable it is very hard to even interview people who are 'white' which makes things challenging How is this even legal? Change 'white' for any other race, and you'd have yourself a workplace discrimination lawsuit.
Re: GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart
#115> Some of the biggest barriers to progress are white women. Can someone explain this ?
Feminism wasn't always as intersectional as it is now. For a long time it was dominated by white women who wanted more equality ignoring and sometimes even opposing equality for people and women of color. Suffragettes are a very good example of this problem. There are a few people now that feel a similar thing is happening in the tech industry right now as well. In that diversity is promoted only in so far as it help…
Some of the early suffragettes - including the first female senator in the US[0] - were not just racist, but outright white supremacists.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Latimer_Felton#Racial_...
Re: GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart
#116> "We’re trying to build a new kind of enterprise company where the playbooks of old won’t always work" By replacing flat meritocracy and remote work with traditional top-down management? > "don't think we'll succeed teaching white, male middle managers empathy and compassion anytime soon, so let's limit their scope of damage" So the technical director and member of the social-impact team is a blatant racist.
Re: GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
I used bitbucket for a long time because it did the job and it provided private repos. But after I had to start looking for another job, many employers wanted to see my github profile.
You can easily make your bitbucket projects public and show them off. No need to be conformed into using a given service.
Re: GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart
#118> "We’re trying to build a new kind of enterprise company where the playbooks of old won’t always work" By replacing flat meritocracy and remote work with traditional top-down management? > "don't think we'll succeed teaching white, male middle managers empathy and compassion anytime soon, so let's limit their scope of damage" So the technical director and member of the social-impact team is a blatant racist.
GitHub has, since the Horvath incident, made it pretty clear what kind of person they want to hire. And, frankly, that's fine. There are plenty of places where I, as a competent white male, can get hired and promoted without difficulty. The fact that Github isn't one of those is not a systematic problem. More power to them.
Re: GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart
#119> "We’re trying to build a new kind of enterprise company where the playbooks of old won’t always work" By replacing flat meritocracy and remote work with traditional top-down management? > "don't think we'll succeed teaching white, male middle managers empathy and compassion anytime soon, so let's limit their scope of damage" So the technical director and member of the social-impact team is a blatant racist.
> So the technical director and member of the social-impact team is a blatant racist. I had the same reaction. I'm surprised nobody else has noticed this and made a comment about it.
People from that circle were proposing the idea of creating 'black lists' to make people unemployable for political reasons; they managed to get Brendan Eich expelled from Mozilla; they're pushing for "Codes of conducts", which again aim at expelling people from open source communities for political reasons - eg things they said in completely unrelated places, like their own Twitter feeds (see "Opalgate").
Also see PronounGate, DongleGate, past scandals at Github (meritocracy rug, Julie-Ann Horvath departure), discussions/scandals around CoC/"Contributor Covenant", etc etc etc.
Re: GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart
#120So where should I move all my repos now?
Yes:
Bitbucket
No:
Self hosted Gitlab instance